Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml
Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3232.0.html).
A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2810_gcc441.7z
For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10_gcc441.7z
The 04 September 2010 build is out.
- Windows :
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20100904_rev6570_win32.7z
- Linux :
none
Resolved Fixed:
- make loggers more bullet proof
- updated wxPropGrid from to 1.4.14 to hopefully fix issues reported here: http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12362.msg88995.html#msg88995
Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:
Hello,
unfortunately, the wxSmith bug is not solved (colours & font editors in wxPropertyGrid not displaying image).
I have however found a fix for the wxsMyColourPropertyClass.
The problem come from a change in name of a virtual method :
from virtual
wxSize GetImageSize() const; to
virtual wxSize OnMeasureImage(int item = -1) const;I have created a new method OnMeasureImage, and now it works !
See patch attached.
Hopefully it will always be that simple for all others regressions in wxSmith.
Regards,
Sebastien
PS: it is written in the wxWidgets doc:
Quotevirtual void wxPGProperty::OnCustomPaint ( wxDC & dc,
const wxRect & rect,
wxPGPaintData & paintdata
) [virtual]
Override to paint an image in front of the property value text or drop-down list item (but only if wxPGProperty::OnMeasureImage is overridden as well).
Thanks!
code:blocks is becoming better and better.
Hello Everybody.
I'm a user of the cppcheck-plugin. The tool itself works. But I'm missing a posibility to configure it.
1. Since I don't have the admin-rights to install cppcheck I've copied a ready installed package from an other computer to my system. It works, but I have to search the tool every-time when i want to start it. Ii there a possibility to set the location in the environment-configuration of code::blocks?
2. If I load the code::blocks project of cppcheck and start cppcheck to testst its own sources I can click on one message, code::blocks opens the file and jumps to the asosiated code-line. If I do the same in my project, I have to search the code-line by my self. How do I have to configure my project to activate the 'find by' click feature?
3. I want to suppress some messages. I can see that cppcheck will be started with an file named 'CppCheckInput.txt'. I think that this file can be used for configuring the tool. But where is it? Or How can I tell code::blocks to use my own one?
Best Regards,
Eckard Klotz.
Quote from: eckard_klotz on September 09, 2010, 12:58:54 PM
3. I want to suppress some messages. I can see that cppcheck will be started with an file named 'CppCheckInput.txt'. I think that this file can be used for configuring the tool. But where is it? Or How can I tell code::blocks to use my own one?
This file is auto generated and it is used to specify which files should be checked. I think it can't be used for error suppression...
cppcheck plug-in currently is not configurable, but it would be good idea (it already crossed our mind) to configure the path for it so it can find the cppcheck executable.
That input file is generated on the fly, for providing the input files, it is not reusable.
Quote from: eckard_klotz on September 09, 2010, 12:58:54 PM
1. Since I don't have the admin-rights to install cppcheck I've copied a ready installed package from an other computer to my system. It works, but I have to search the tool every-time when i want to start it. Ii there a possibility to set the location in the environment-configuration of code::blocks?
This you can actually solve if you put the executable to your path or in the path where
codeblocks.exe is located. Alternatively expand the PATH environment variable to the path where your
cppcheck.exe is.
However, surely the plugin could be enhanced to offer at least some configuration options.
Hello Everybody.
Thanks for the quick reaction. I learned the plug-in is still under development and there is somebody who is interested in ideas to define new features. That's great.
Has anybody an idea why the cppcheck-project is able to activate the 'find by click' feature I described (and why my project is not)?
Quote
2. If I load the code::blocks project of cppcheck and start cppcheck to testst its own sources I can click on one message, code::blocks opens the file and jumps to the asosiated code-line. If I do the same in my project, I have to search the code-line by my self. How do I have to configure my project to activate the 'find by' click feature?
Best regards,
Eckard Klotz.
Quote from: eckard_klotz on September 09, 2010, 06:41:15 PM
Has anybody an idea why the cppcheck-project is able to activate the 'find by click' feature I described (and why my project is not)?
No, this works for me. Can you send a stripped sample project where it does not? Is it probably Makefile based (although this still should work)?!
When i use abbreviation, new line symbols '\n' just printing in editor. It was working fine before.
Excuse me, but I have question.
What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
I have downloaded "Code::Blocks 10.05" which displayed on index.
Please tell me which patch should I have?
"build (6570)" or "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version"
Thanks a lot.
Quote from: ChaiAo on September 10, 2010, 03:34:44 PM
What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
....read the last sentences.
Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 10, 2010, 04:22:27 PM
Quote from: ChaiAo on September 10, 2010, 03:34:44 PM
What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
....read the last sentences.
Thanks a lot.
But why doesn't Mr. killerbot put them together?
Quote from: ChaiAo on September 11, 2010, 03:13:59 PM
Quote from: MortenMacFly on September 10, 2010, 04:22:27 PM
Quote from: ChaiAo on September 10, 2010, 03:34:44 PM
What's the different between "build (6570)" and "build (6570) DEBUGGER BRANCH version" please?
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,13170.msg88486.html#msg88486
....read the last sentences.
Thanks a lot.
But why doesn't Mr. killerbot put them together?
The debugger branch will be merged with the trunk as soon as it becomes stable. The "Debugger Branch" releases are meant precisely for testing towards this end.
OK. Thank you!
:)
Hello Everybody.
Especialy to Morten: sory for my late reply.
QuoteQuoteHas anybody an idea why the cppcheck-project is able to activate the 'find by click' feature I described (and why my project is not)?
No, this works for me. Can you send a stripped sample project where it does not? Is it probably Makefile based (although this still should work)?!
I added a special test-project as zip-file. It contains 2 simple sources in the src-folder and several code::blocks projects in different folder-levels. If I activate the projects in the sub-folder "CppCheck\CppCheck\prj" or in the sub-folder "CppCheck\CppCheck\prj\CppCheck" I'm not able to find the location associated to the cppcheck-message by click. The other 2 projects are able to find the location by click. Could it be path-problem?
Best Regards,
Eckard Klotz.
I have downloaded, I will try to have a look at it this week.
I checked it.
It is not a CB issue, it seems it is an issue in cppcheck it self.
This is the result of calling cppcheck manually on the command line :
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck/CppCheck/prj> cppcheck --verbose --all --style ../../src/test.cpp
Checking ../../src/test.cpp...
[src/test.cpp:7]: (style) Unused variable: ReturnValue
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck/CppCheck/prj>
As you can see : cppcheck is giving back an incorrect path : [src/test.cpp:7]
Similar when we go even one level deeper :
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck/CppCheck/prj/CppCheck> cppcheck --verbose --all --style ../../../src/test.cpp
Checking ../../../src/test.cpp...
[../src/test.cpp:7]: (style) Unused variable: ReturnValue
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck/CppCheck/prj/CppCheck>
Basically it boils down to : when the directory where cppcheck is invoked is at a deeper level then the sources to check, things start to go wrong.
The first 2 cases in your example zip file were 1 level higher, or at the same level
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck> cppcheck --verbose --all --style ./src/test.cpp
Checking ./src/test.cpp...
[./src/test.cpp:7]: (style) Unused variable: ReturnValue
ldco@linux-jyub:~/Projects/TryOuts/Test_CppCheck/CppCheck/CppCheck> cppcheck --verbose --all --style ../src/test.cpp
Checking ../src/test.cpp...
[../src/test.cpp:7]: (style) Unused variable: ReturnValue
created a bug report for it with cppcheck : https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/cppcheck/ticket/2059
Hello Killerbot.
Thanks for your fast checking.
Best Regards,
Eckard Klotz.
and more good news, the guys of cppcheck fixed the bug. So it will be available in cppcheck 1.45
Quote
Version 1.45 is planned to be released on October 10th
So we just have to wait a few more weeks, of you can get their sources out of git, and compile it yourself ...
Quote from: eckard_klotz on September 22, 2010, 12:56:29 PM
Thanks for your fast checking.
Seems I missed this post (and the rmeinder :-(). I just saw killerbot did it. Sorry for that.
Hello Killerbot and hello Morten.
I think you and the other developer make a great job and currently you have a lot do do with codecompletion an debuger. Thus it's OK if my problem has lower priority.
By the way, it is right that I'm not able to load up a file as my example while submitting a bug-report.
Best Regards,
Eckard.
Quote from: eckard_klotz on September 23, 2010, 07:02:06 PM
By the way, it is right that I'm not able to load up a file as my example while submitting a bug-report.
Yes, but you can point to relevant information /archives in the forums in the bug report. That's very convenient, usually.
Quote from: killerbot on September 23, 2010, 09:05:43 AM
and more good news, the guys of cppcheck fixed the bug. So it will be available in cppcheck 1.45
Quote
Version 1.45 is planned to be released on October 10th
So we just have to wait a few more weeks, of you can get their sources out of git, and compile it yourself ...
Cppcheck 1.45 is out, and I have tested our test cases, and all work fine now. Thumbs up for the cppcheck guys :-)