Text only | Text with Images

Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on March 01, 2017, 08:47:31 PM

Title: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: killerbot on March 01, 2017, 08:47:31 PM
Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

Before you use a nightly make sure you understand how it works (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3232.0.html).

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc510-TDM-2.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/Prerequisites/mingwm10_gcc510-TDM.7z

The 01 March 2017 build is out.
  - Windows :
   http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/Nightlies/2017/CB_20170301_rev11021_win32.7z
  - Linux :
   none

The current SDK version is : 1.30.0

Resolved Fixed:


Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:


Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Melchior on March 01, 2017, 09:01:16 PM
thanks :)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: damorin on March 02, 2017, 07:29:31 PM
Hi,

I installed it on the last nightly build (Win7 64-bit) and since then when I click to view a function or define, it's opening the wrong one; same name but from another similar project and the project is not even opened in C::B.

I remember there is some kind of parser/symbol file to delete for forcing C::B to re-parse symbols but can't find it in older posts.

Can someone help ?

Thanks



Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: raynebc on March 02, 2017, 09:06:31 PM
Does using "Project>Reparse current project" help the issue for you?  I occasionally have to do this or just re-open C::B because the parser had broken itself.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Melchior on March 05, 2017, 02:19:15 AM
Quote from: Khram on March 05, 2017, 02:04:26 AM
After a very tiring reinstall - spell check not working. Last suitable for working version - 9958.  :'(
YOu might have to reconfigure CodeBlock's Spell Check...

I noticed spell check dictionaries are not included with CodeBlocks especially in the default location which is
.\CodeBlocks\share\CodeBlocks\SpellChecker\

I point to my Firefox spell check files
C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\dictionaries  for 64bit install

I have attached a screenshot of my settings...
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: raynebc on March 05, 2017, 03:42:33 AM
You strongly over estimate how big a problem that spell check issue is for the user base as a whole.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Biplab on March 05, 2017, 04:43:10 AM
Win 64 Build is available at the following url (includes all required runtime files) -
Quotehttps://app.box.com/s/7vvac33n8l4fzliyed1v8x8cjn9cigr1

NOTE:
This build may be unstable.

Compiled with wxWidgets 3.0.2 and -
Code Select
g++ (x86_64-win32-sjlj-rev1, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 6.1.0
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

1) SpellChecker plugin excluded due to following unresolved crash
https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/87/
2) NassiShneiderman plugin will be included in future build.

Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Melchior on March 05, 2017, 04:46:53 AM
Nice hope your 64bit build works out...
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: raynebc on March 05, 2017, 08:22:20 AM
According to who?
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on March 05, 2017, 09:39:59 AM
Quote from: Khram on March 05, 2017, 02:04:26 AM
After a very tiring reinstall - spell check not working. Last suitable for working version - 9958.  :'(
Next time please post a link to this topic http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20195.0.html or post in the topic or post patches...
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on March 05, 2017, 01:06:52 PM
Hi, biplab, thanks for the builds.
I download your builds, and run it by such command:
Code Select
start cblauncher.exe --debug-log --no-dde --no-check-associations --multiple-instance --no-splash-screen --verbose
Then I have such error report, see image shot below.
(http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv194/ollydbg_cb/2017-03-05%2020%2004%2012_zpssyuvnifl.png)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Biplab on March 05, 2017, 03:13:50 PM
Quote from: ollydbg on March 05, 2017, 01:06:52 PM
Hi, biplab, thanks for the builds.
I download your builds, and run it by such command:
Code Select
start cblauncher.exe --debug-log --no-dde --no-check-associations --multiple-instance --no-splash-screen --verbose
Then I have such error report, see image shot below.
(http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv194/ollydbg_cb/2017-03-05%2020%2004%2012_zpssyuvnifl.png)
Confirmed that error message. Most likely it is an issue in CbLauncher. Need to investigate further.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on March 05, 2017, 03:35:48 PM
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Biplab on March 05, 2017, 03:41:49 PM
Quote from: oBFusCATed on March 05, 2017, 03:35:48 PM
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.
I'm now convinced this issue is due to multiple instances; and not due to CbLauncher. C::B is unable to find zip files and load them.
QuoteManager failed to load XRC resource 'C:\CB_20170301_rev11021_win64\share\codeblocks\Cccc.zip'.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: eckard_klotz on March 05, 2017, 05:26:56 PM
Hello Everybody.

To prevent fale positive detections by my virus scaner Norton 360 I have asked Symantec to set the binaries of this nightly on their white list what they already have done:
Quote
Hello,

In relation to software whitelist submission 4070276.

We have added this version of the software to our whitelist.
Whitelisting is file specific. A new version of your software may have new files and thus new versions of the files would not be known to us. This could result in a false positive occurring on the new files.
In order to mitigate this risk, we recommend submitting new versions of your software to us.

Symantec's decision is not a certification or endorsement of your software in any way, and you are expressly advised by this message that Symantec does not consent to you disclosing that Symantec has added your software to its White-List, or that Symantec has evaluated, endorsed or certified your software in any manner, directly or indirectly.

Decisions made by Symantec are subject to change if alterations to the software are made over time or as classification criteria and/or the policy employed by Symantec changes over time to address the evolving landscape.

Please see our software whitelist program FAQ here: https://support.symantec.com/en_US/article.TECH232956.html

Sincerely,
Symantec Security Response
http://securityresponse.symantec.com

Best regards,
                    Eckard.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Kilmatead on March 07, 2017, 12:59:45 PM
The new version of the code formatter seems to have trouble with ternary operators - any time it encounters one (even something simple like 'i ? 1 : 0' it throws an assertion:

QuoteFile: C:\CodeBlocks\sf2\src\plugins\ast...\ASForematter.cpp
Line: 3229

Expression: currentChar == '+' || currentChar == '-'

Swapping out the astyle.dll for an older version solves it.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on March 07, 2017, 09:38:52 PM
Kilmatead: Can you post the full stacktrace or a minimal sample and steps to reproduce?
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Kilmatead on March 08, 2017, 11:41:55 AM
Reproducing is easy (at least for me, Win7 x64)... thinking it might be some conflict of settings, I removed the %appdata% codeblocks user-settings and tried it stock and the same thing happens every time.

So, just open CB (preferably at stock), use File -> New -> Empty File and type a nonsense line like:

Code Select
int i = 1 ? 0 : 0;

Then hit Plugins -> Source Code Formatter, and I immediately get the same broken assertion every time.  If I remove the ternary, then astyle formats just fine.  Changing settings in astyle makes no difference, it seems to happen for all styles/options (in this latest version - like I said, DLL's for astyle from previous nightlies work fine).

I first discovered this on a larger project, and narrowed it down to always (and only) happening on lines containing a ?: ternary.

As an extra added bonus, when used with stock settings CB itself crashes, no matter which option is chosen.  Under my usual setup I could at least 'Ignore' it and continue.

(http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/h440/Kilmatead/Tern.png)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: stahta01 on March 08, 2017, 01:07:08 PM
To expand on Kilmatead issue.

I reproduced it on Windows 10 32 bit.

Code Select

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

int main()
{
    int i = 1 ? 0 : 0;

    cout << "Hello world!" << endl;
    return 0;
}


Attched crash report.

Tim S.


Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Jenna on March 08, 2017, 01:17:32 PM
I can easily reproduce it here on Linux also.
It crashes in the version from my copr-repo (latest trunk) and on F26 with C::B 16.01 linked again system-astyle.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Jenna on March 08, 2017, 01:26:23 PM
Related bug-report:
https://sourceforge.net/p/astyle/bugs/423/

It's already fixed in astyle trunk.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: cacb on March 09, 2017, 10:54:13 PM
Built C::B svn 11019 on Kubuntu 16.10 64bit from Jens' source file at https://apt.jenslody.de/stable/pool/main/ (thanks!)

Seems to work fine.

My wish is that the toolbars either are more compacted or somehow configurable so I can remove icons i don't use. They take up far too much space both horizontally and vertically. I have to disable the Code completion toolbar even though I have a 24' screen.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on March 10, 2017, 04:29:03 AM
Quote from: cacb on March 09, 2017, 10:54:13 PM
My wish is that the toolbars either are more compacted or somehow configurable so I can remove icons i don't use.
The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: cacb on March 10, 2017, 09:02:17 PM
Quote from: ollydbg on March 10, 2017, 04:29:03 AM
The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)

I just made a small experiment to see if it would work. I identified the file
codeblocks-16.01svn/src/plugins/codecompletion/resources/codecompletion_toolbar.xrc

and halved the widths of the 2 wxChoice items to 143 and 330 each, and then rebuilt Code::Blocks. That gave me a code completion toolbar half the width it was before. I still see most of what I need to see.  I realize this is not a general or even portable solution, but at least it shows where the issue is.

I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on March 11, 2017, 04:55:29 AM
Quote from: cacb on March 10, 2017, 09:02:17 PM
Quote from: ollydbg on March 10, 2017, 04:29:03 AM
The current implementation of all the toolbar's are "hard-coded", I mean many of toolbar are written in XRC resource files, so it is not configurable. Maybe there are some functions in wxWidgest which can hide some ununsed icons. So, patches are welcome. :)

I just made a small experiment to see if it would work. I identified the file
codeblocks-16.01svn/src/plugins/codecompletion/resources/codecompletion_toolbar.xrc

and halved the widths of the 2 wxChoice items to 143 and 330 each, and then rebuilt Code::Blocks. That gave me a code completion toolbar half the width it was before. I still see most of what I need to see.  I realize this is not a general or even portable solution, but at least it shows where the issue is.

I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.
Long time ago, I have a patch to modify and configure the CodeCompletion's toolbar, see here: Code::Blocks / Tickets / #303 make code completion's toolbar configurable (https://sourceforge.net/p/codeblocks/tickets/303/)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: ollydbg on March 12, 2017, 10:22:55 AM
Quote from: cacb on March 10, 2017, 09:02:17 PM
I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.
Hi, cacb, can you look at this thread, it looks like this is the exact issue as you stated:
toolbar bottom edge is not shown corectly under C::B build with wx git master (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20938.msg143048.html#msg143048)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: cacb on March 12, 2017, 12:59:00 PM
Quote from: ollydbg on March 12, 2017, 10:22:55 AM
Quote from: cacb on March 10, 2017, 09:02:17 PM
I didn't try to make the other toolbars more compact, they still waste space in particular vertically. The main problem seems to be caused by wxChoice items in combination with much "air" around.
Hi, cacb, can you look at this thread, it looks like this is the exact issue as you stated:
toolbar bottom edge is not shown corectly under C::B build with wx git master (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20938.msg143048.html#msg143048)

Hi, yes it looks related at least. I added a couple of screenshots comparing what I see on Windows (an older wx2.8 based nightly build) compared to a local build on Kubuntu 16.10 using recent C::B source compiled against wx.3.0

See http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20938.msg148345.html#msg148345 (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,20938.msg148345.html#msg148345)
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Biplab on March 13, 2017, 07:15:23 PM
Quote from: oBFusCATed on March 05, 2017, 03:35:48 PM
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.

You are right. There is a sanity check in wx code that prompts that dialog if xrc file is missing. However there is no way to stop this assert message.

For the time being we have to ignore this harmless message till a solution is found.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on March 13, 2017, 08:48:16 PM
We can just remove the calls for loading the resources, I think or even remove the empty zip files (I think there are some plugins without resources).
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Jenna on March 13, 2017, 09:29:36 PM
We get this message only, if C::B is started with the "-v"-switch to show more verbose debugging messages, so it should not be a problem for the default user.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: cacb on March 13, 2017, 11:19:50 PM
Quote from: Biplab on March 13, 2017, 07:15:23 PM
Quote from: oBFusCATed on March 05, 2017, 03:35:48 PM
It is a new warning in wx3 that asserts if the zip file doesn't contain any xrc files in it. For some of the plugins this is really the case.

You are right. There is a sanity check in wx code that prompts that dialog if xrc file is missing. However there is no way to stop this assert message.

For the time being we have to ignore this harmless message till a solution is found.

Is this the same message?  I get it in the "Code::Blocks" tab (did not see it until now). Linux Kubuntu 16.10

Scanning for plugins in /usr/lib/codeblocks/plugins
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/ThreadSearch.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/headerfixup.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/wxSmithAui.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/CppCheck.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/EditorConfig.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/Cscope.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/Valgrind.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/DoxyBlocks.zip'.
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/Cccc.zip'.
Tools Plus Plugin: Registering shell type Piped Process Control
Manager failed to load XRC resource '/usr/share/codeblocks/ToolsPlus.zip'.

The 'failed to load messages' are all in red. From the above discussion it looks like it can be ignored?


Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: oBFusCATed on March 14, 2017, 12:55:28 AM
Yes, these are the messages. Just ignore them.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: exchg on March 15, 2017, 09:09:28 PM
Hi to all.

Since two last nightly build autoversioning plugin looks like broken. After restarting codeblocks it is reset all version data to zero.
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Jaap on April 12, 2017, 05:17:11 PM
Dear Developers,

In this nightly the source formatter seems broken.
It always raises a assertion failure.

Best regards,

Jaap
Title: Re: The 01 March 2017 build (11021) is out.
Post by: Miguel Gimenez on April 12, 2017, 07:07:33 PM
Jaap, this problem is corrected in SVN (r11039). You can compile from sources or wait for the next nightly.
Text only | Text with Images