Print Page - The 09 february 2006 build is out.

Title: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on February 10, 2006, 12:21:10 AM

Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml
A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://download.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26u_gcc_cb.7z
For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://download.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

For support of ansi builds, a link to the ansi windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://download.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26_gcc_cb.7z

The 09 February 2006 build is out.
- Windows : http://download.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_09feb2006_rev1970_win32.7z
- Linux : not supported yet

Resolved Fixed:

Refactored Compiler class to use string IDs instead of numeric. No more messing up user-defined compilers. Users should only re-define their user-defined compilers for the last time
Debugger's debug log can now be shown/hidden without requiring C::B to restart. Will implement this for other logs too

Keybinder v0.4.15
Removed incorrect delete of dlg
fixed "PRIOR/NEXT" unrecognized keys in wxGetAccelFromString

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:

DDE bug : clicking in windows explorer on a CB registered file throws an error message box
toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem)
new created files have no highlight style

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: mmebane on February 10, 2006, 07:52:12 PM

Could you change the name of the files to something like
CB_2006-02-09_rev1970_win32.7z
?

I've been saving these builds for easy regression testing purposes, and they're starting to get messy. :P

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: killerbot on February 10, 2006, 09:36:52 PM

anyone else in favor of such a change.
One thing though : I would keep a month by name, so no confusion on day/month (europe <--> usa) ...

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: Game_Ender on February 10, 2006, 09:43:58 PM

Yes I am too something like CB_Feb_09_2006_rev1970_win32.7z would probably do nicely.

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: Michael on February 10, 2006, 09:44:29 PM

Quote from: killerbot on February 10, 2006, 09:36:52 PM
anyone else in favor of such a change.

No problems from my side :D.

Quote from: killerbot on February 10, 2006, 09:36:52 PM
One thing though : I would keep a month by name, so no confusion on day/month (europe <--> usa) ...

What it is important IMHO is (1)to clearly define the format of the name, (2) to say it explicitly (so that all know about it) and (3) to try in the limit of the possible to not change it. This just to avoid confusion and misunderstandings.

Michael

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: takeshimiya on February 10, 2006, 09:54:33 PM

I always use dates in ISO form (YYYYMMDD) because it makes everything easier, not only in computer-related things.

Title: Re: The 09 february 2006 build is out.
Post by: mmebane on February 11, 2006, 12:17:08 AM

Quote from: Game_Ender on February 10, 2006, 09:43:58 PM
Yes I am too something like CB_Feb_09_2006_rev1970_win32.7z would probably do nicely.

Except sorting would still be off. That's why I suggest using the ISO date format.

Code::Blocks Forums

User forums => Nightly builds => Topic started by: killerbot on February 10, 2006, 12:21:10 AM