Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml
A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx283.7z
For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z
The 09 May 2007 build is out.
- Windows :
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070509_rev3948_win32.7z
- Linux :
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070509_rev3948_Ubuntu6.xx.deb (not yet)
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070509_rev3948_suse100-102.i586.rpm (not yet)
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070509_rev3948_fc4+5.i586.rpm (not yet)
Resolved Fixed:
- Fixed: Couple of deprecated functions warning with wx-2.8
- CodeSnippets - correct windows .cbp to match changed linux cbp
- applied patch 1989 : Fixes "new file not added to project" bug
Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:
- toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem)
Ubuntu 6.10 & 7.04 Amd64 .deb installer can be found here (http://www.esnips.com/web/CodeBlocks).
There is a Ubuntu 7.04 i386 build here: http://www.savefile.com/files/707996
Also, there seems to be a bug with creating wxSmith projects. When I click file -> new -> project -> wxWidgets project -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Finish I get the following error (I selected wxWidgets2.8.x, wxSmith, Frame Based, Default wxWidgets Configuration and am using GCC):
SquirrelFunction<> call failed
AN ERROR HAS OCCURED [the index 'project' does not exist]
CALLSTACK
*FUNCTION [SetupTarget()] /usr/share/codeblocks/templates/wizard/wxwidgets/wizard.script line [846]
*FUNCTION [SetupProject()] /usr/share/codeblocks/templates/wizard/wxwidgets/wizard.script line [570]
LOCALS
[exe_output_dir] INSTANCE
[exe_file_name] INSTANCE
[obj_output_dir] INSTANCE
[is_debug] true
[target] INSTANCE
[this] TABLE
[target] INSTANCE
[libdir] NULL
[project] INSTANCE
[this] TABLE
Thanks
Quote from: killerbot on May 09, 2007, 08:07:01 PM
- applied patch 1989 : Fixes "new file not added to project" bug
Thanks!! :D
This seems to fix the problem:
In file /usr/share/codeblocks/templates/wizard/wxwidgets/wizard.script
846,847c846,847
< project.AddCompilerOption(_T("`wx-config --cflags`"));
< project.AddLinkerOption(_T("`wx-config --libs`"));
---
> target.AddCompilerOption(_T("`wx-config --cflags`"));
> target.AddLinkerOption(_T("`wx-config --libs`"));
Just edit the script and change 'project' to 'target'.
Germán
Quote from: CyberSlayer on May 09, 2007, 09:24:09 PM
There is a Ubuntu 7.04 i386 build here: http://www.savefile.com/files/707996
Also, there seems to be a bug with creating wxSmith projects. When I click file -> new -> project -> wxWidgets project -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Next -> Finish I get the following error (I selected wxWidgets2.8.x, wxSmith, Frame Based, Default wxWidgets Configuration and am using GCC):
SquirrelFunction<> call failed
AN ERROR HAS OCCURED [the index 'project' does not exist]
CALLSTACK
*FUNCTION [SetupTarget()] /usr/share/codeblocks/templates/wizard/wxwidgets/wizard.script line [846]
*FUNCTION [SetupProject()] /usr/share/codeblocks/templates/wizard/wxwidgets/wizard.script line [570]
LOCALS
[exe_output_dir] INSTANCE
[exe_file_name] INSTANCE
[obj_output_dir] INSTANCE
[is_debug] true
[target] INSTANCE
[this] TABLE
[target] INSTANCE
[libdir] NULL
[project] INSTANCE
[this] TABLE
Thanks
Ok. That fixes it. Thanks.
Quote from: CyberSlayer on May 09, 2007, 10:07:55 PM
Ok. That fixes it. Thanks.
Thanks to CyberSlayer and Germán. :) Now the fix is in head.
Recently a major overhaul was made in wxWidgets wizard. The bug is due to that change. :)
Regards,
Biplab
Hi, I would like to know what happen with the Ubuntu 6.10 build, because since may 3 all the nightly's say (not yet)?
Thanks for your help.
They are not built that's all.
Why don't you upgrade to Feisty?
Kurapix
Quoteapplied patch 1989 : Fixes "new file not added to project" bug
EE! That's good!
Don't You hardcore guys think about RC3 - quite some time ago I heared about it. May be do RC3 and then (after 1-2 month or how it must be) "fully functional with all the heck" RC4? C::B does not have to be perfect right now - it can be "as it is" in RC3 (IM(not very "H")O). Just shake the society with a major release? :)
My opinion but why not?
Glad to see You
Roman
I agree with Roman!!! The wold should be quaked. :twisted: Let you kick the MS ass (specially with wxSmith).
Hey, I am the world. I want to be quaked! Please give us RC3
Really ... we don't have to complain of anything.
If you're not happy with RC2 just use the nightly.
It's possible to make a package that install everything if I'm not mistaking (with NSIS on Windows).
Kurapix
Quote from: kurapix on May 11, 2007, 03:37:03 AM
If you're not happy with RC2 just use the nightly.
After some reflexion I agree with you kurapix. Let's not have any new stable release, so that we can keep C::B as our little secret. That way no company or institution will ever install it on their workstations and the dirty hordes won't even know it exists.
I think that while bugs remain(for ex. * toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem) *) no RC3 will be out.
Quote from: GTOnizuka on May 11, 2007, 12:55:40 PM
I think that while bugs remain(for ex. * toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem) *) no RC3 will be out.
There are always bugs in a big program, so you can't wait until they are all solved.
Too bad there is no information what so ever about the follow up of RC2 for several months.
Quote from: GTOnizuka on May 11, 2007, 12:55:40 PM
I think that while bugs remain(for ex. * toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem) *) no RC3 will be out.
They are waiting till the items on the road map are done and the bugs in Code::Blocks are fixed is my guess.
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Roadmap_for_version_1.0#Version_1.0_RC_3_.28Ephialtes.29
Quote
XML-based compiler framework
Property-based build system
Automatic updates
Usability and stability fixes for code completion plugin
Regression and bug handling.
Tim S
This is my first post, so I must say this before anything else: Code::Blocks rocks! I've been using it for more than a year now, and it always surprises me to see the new features and the constant support.
Speaking of support... I've got two problems with this build (also reported in the bug tracker):
- On WinXP, I cannot show any debug window when using the Debugger toolbar. It was working on an older version (April 15, rev.3858, still using wx2.6.3) (bug #11052).
- On Linux (Ubuntu Feisty), as soon as I click on the build selector in the toolbar, it disappears (bug #011053)
Good luck with those.
Quote from: XMoby on May 11, 2007, 05:39:54 PM
- On WinXP, I cannot show any debug window when using the Debugger toolbar. It was working on an older version (April 15, rev.3858, still using wx2.6.3) (bug #11052).
This is a wxWidgets bug. Just use wx2.8.4-rc dll (you've to compile yourself) and the bug will go away. Wait for the wx2.8.4 release.
Quote from: Biplab on May 11, 2007, 07:32:28 PM
Quote from: XMoby on May 11, 2007, 05:39:54 PM
- On WinXP, I cannot show any debug window when using the Debugger toolbar. It was working on an older version (April 15, rev.3858, still using wx2.6.3) (bug #11052).
This is a wxWidgets bug. Just use wx2.8.4-rc dll (you've to compile yourself) and the bug will go away. Wait for the wx2.8.4 release.
They (wx-devs) are hoping on an wx2.8.4 final on Monday, I am not sure if that means an RC-final or release final.
Tim S
- Mac OS X : (10.4 Universal)
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20070509_rev3948_macx86.zip
Still uses wxWidgets 2.6.3p2 because I got bored with trying wxWidgets 2.8.3...
Maybe try again later when wxWidgets 2.8.4 is released, see if that fixes things.
lets just fix "the bug" and call it RC3. :idea: :wink:
Quote from: codeur on May 11, 2007, 11:53:21 AM
Quote from: kurapix on May 11, 2007, 03:37:03 AM
If you're not happy with RC2 just use the nightly.
After some reflexion I agree with you kurapix. Let's not have any new stable release, so that we can keep C::B as our little secret. That way no company or institution will ever install it on their workstations and the dirty hordes won't even know it exists.
Holy S**T! Damn Right! Codeur! Kurapix!
Code::Blocks!
Don't misunderstand!
I don't want Code:Blocks to stay our little secret but it's sometimes ... when someone just ask away : I WANT RC3 of Code::Blocks (like it's an order and this person want it immediately) ... it's quite unrespectful since not all user of Code:Blocks contribute to it, we don't have to ask this as the CB team don't have to receive orders from us that's why I answered like that.
Read my answer entirely please! If I say that it's possible to make a full package (with compiler and CB and wxWidget runtime) it's not just make it a beautiful post but it is to say that if you want a full package so badly then make it, don't order for it (the answer has already been given : the goals haven't been fullfilled to achieve RC3 status).
If you still want to argue about this then PM, don't wanna mess out the CB forums.
Sorry again for the trouble.
Thank you for reading.
Kurapix
I'm making a package for me OpenSuse 10.2, where I can distribute my RPM ( I'm making i686 version and svn 3960 )?
Any problems for i686? Should I make a i386 package?