Anyone using Bazaar Version Control with Code::Blocks?

[stahta01]

Anyone:

I am going to learn how to use Bazaar Version Control; has anyone setup a external tool or other way to use Bazaar under Code::Blocks?

Tim S.

[MortenMacFly]

I guess dmoores "FileManager" plugin comes mostly close to it. It may need some patches for that purposes though...

[stahta01]

I guess dmoores "FileManager" plugin comes mostly close to it. It may need some patches for that purposes though...

Thanks, that was my thought before it split into two parts. I was not sure which part was the correct part;
I have not taken the time to see what each part does.

Tim S.

The plug-in being talked about link below
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10060.0.html

[MortenMacFly]

Thanks, that was my thought before it split into two parts. I was not sure which part was the correct part;

The plug-in being talked about link below
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,10060.0.html

Ah - sorry, you are right. The ShellExtensions you may need in addition. FileManager creates an explorer like windows, shell manager can do the overlays concering version controls and related commands. There is a patch pending that does "something" (I fogot) in the SDK to enable FileManager to show the overlays in the project, too IIRC...

[dmoore]

FileManager will give you status decorators for bzr/hg/svn. It's clunky and only sorta works because it relies on munging the output of the respective "stat" commands, which don't provide reliable status info for some files.

PowerShell lets you add context sensitive custom commands. The interface is pretty clunky, but you can easily add commands like "bzr add/remove/diff" that operate on on one or more files in the editor, file manager or the project tree

[dmoore]

There is a patch pending that does "something" (I fogot) in the SDK to enable FileManager to show the overlays in the project, too IIRC...

this is news to me. In principle it would not be difficult to support this, but not sure it would necessarily belong in the file manager...

[MortenMacFly]

this is news to me. In principle it would not be difficult to support this, but not sure it would necessarily belong in the file manager...

Well you provided this to me once... interesting you forgot... :shock: