The 12 July 2006 build is out.

[killerbot]

Get quick announcements through the RSS feed http://www.codeblocks.org/nightly/CodeBlock_RSS.xml

A link to the unicode windows wxWidget dll for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26u_gcc_cb_wx2.6.3p2.7z

For those who might need this one (when no MingW installed on your system) : the mingw10m.dll : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/mingwm10.7z

For support of ansi builds, a link to the ansi windows wxWidget dll (2.6.2) for Code::Blocks : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/wxmsw26_gcc_cb.7z

The 12 July 2006 build is out.
  - Windows : http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_win32.7z
  - Linux :
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not this time)
         http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_fc4+5.rpm


Resolved Fixed:

• Removed the old "C::B plugin wizard" plugin (src/plugins/pluginwizard)
• Renamed src/plugins/projectwizard to src/plugins/scriptedwizard
• Updated all build files
• Updated all build files
• fixed broken update scripts to match removed plugin_wizard and renamed project_wizard
• Updated autotools build system.
    + Added SPEC file for RPMs (thanks Daniel).
    + Added auto-versioning of package
• Sanity checks in scripted wizard
• Added man pages for codeblocks and cb_console_runner executables
• help plug-in : "Locate in" is now implemented as a sub-menu
• Old wxSmith:
  * Adopted wxsDrawingWindow from new wxSmith (should fix many visual problems inside editor)

Regressions/Confirmed/Annoying/Common bugs:

• toolbar-images-not-changing-state (is a wx problem/Win XP problem)
• there are several issues with Code Completion (is being redesigned : work in progress)
• menu items with icon not correctly aligned (since wx263)

[Zingam]

       http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not this time)

why?

[killerbot]

      http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not this time)

why?

Our deb builder, Michael, is at the moment unable to provide builds, so we will have to wait untill he can provide them again. Meanwhile we might ourselves build one from time to time (not me : I use suse).

[iw2nhl]

If you start the wxSmith project wizard and leave the 'base directory' field empty, the error 'project path must be absolute' is shown and all the widgets get greyed out. You can only kill the application to exit.
I think that:
1) the error message is wrong, it should be something like 'please specify a base directory'
2) widgets should not be grayed out
3) also if widgets are greyed out, the 'X' to close the window should still work (it is NOT grayed out, but it is not clickable, seems frozen)
I noticed this at first run (really my first run at all of CodeBlocks!) and I had to reenter initial configuration (compiler and file associations) at next run because it was lost.
I think this is not good, probably it is better to save the configuration before letting the user work for the first time, so it get not lost.
Any way, good work! (to me too, I'm here to help coding, hopefully)

Windows 2000 SP4
CodeBlocks 1.0 rev 2740

P.S.: I could have not understood something, if so... sorry!
P.S. 2: Are you asking yourself why I left that field empty? Simple: to see what would have happened leaving it empty! (Yes, I always begin using programs, trying to make them crash, then I use them in the correct way ;-))

[Acki]

Hi,
I found an error within the context menu system !!!  :shock:
(I mean right click on source code)
You changed the location of the "Locate in Anyhelp" section to an own sub menu called "Locate in"...
Now there still stands "Locate in Anyhelp", I mean the menu path is like this: "Locate in->Locate in Anyhelp" !!!
I think it now should be "Locate in->Anyhelp" !?!?!

I know it's just a little optical issue...
And as it's only a short text, it should be easy to change...

thx, Acki

[cstudent]

      http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not this time)

why?

I have been communicating with Michael via email the last few days about this. He said he should be able to start providing the .debs again within a few weeks. He did clue me in on how the process worked and I created my own .deb. I have uploaded it to my website if you want to grab a copy. http://wjkirby.googlepages.com I make no claims as to being as good as Michael, but it seems to be working fine on my system.

Take care,
Bill

[thomas]

      http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/CB_20060712_rev2740_Ubuntu6.06.deb (not this time)
why?

Besides, we are having a .deb for Ubuntu every day, both for i686 and amd64...

[ahlongxp]

I have been communicating with Michael via email the last few days about this. He said he should be able to start providing the .debs again within a few weeks. He did clue me in on how the process worked and I created my own .deb. I have uploaded it to my website if you want to grab a copy. http://wjkirby.googlepages.com I make no claims as to being as good as Michael, but it seems to be working fine on my system.

Take care,
Bill

Thanks for your job

[Michael]

I make no claims as to being as good as Michael, but it seems to be working fine on my system.

Hello,

I am sure that your .deb packages are as good as mine .

Yiannis has made the hard part by creating the debian repository. The rest is more or less a matter of a couple of commands .

Best wishes,
Michael