Project Template For AVR GCC Compiler

[oBFusCATed]

There is some info about it: http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Creating_a_patch_to_submit_to_BerliOS_%28Patch_Tracker%29

[twgray]

I am running Ubuntu and have it set up to get updates to CB automatically.  Will this be part of the updates now, or do I have to do something else to implement?

[MortenMacFly]

I am running Ubuntu and have it set up to get updates to CB automatically.  Will this be part of the updates now, or do I have to do something else to implement?

Most likely you'll need to add Jens' repo to the Ubuntu package sources (see http://apt.jenslody.de/).

[scarphin]

I am running Ubuntu and have it set up to get updates to CB automatically.  Will this be part of the updates now, or do I have to do something else to implement?

Most likely you'll need to add Jens' repo to the Ubuntu package sources (see http://apt.jenslody.de/).

I guess he's talking about the modified template. If I didn't get it wrong, the linux version is updated with the modified template at least Jens repository. So what about windows version?

[twgray]

Exactly right, thanks. 

Now, I know it is slightly off topic, but has anyone gotten avr-gdb to work with C::B?  I searched this forum and only saw a single post from 2007.  Hopefully things have improved since then?

[oBFusCATed]

If you have to use gdbserver, you'll have to try a debugger's branch nightly build.

[twgray]

I guess I should start a new topic, but I don't understand the last reply.  Do I understand you to say that in order to use avr-gdb with avarice I need the debugger nightly build of C::B?  Where is the information about how to do that?  I have the Http://apt/jenslody.de Ubuntu packages and get updates as they become available, but how do I get the debugger updates?

[Jenna]

I guess I should start a new topic, but I don't understand the last reply.  Do I understand you to say that in order to use avr-gdb with avarice I need the debugger nightly build of C::B?  Where is the information about how to do that?  I have the Http://apt/jenslody.de Ubuntu packages and get updates as they become available, but how do I get the debugger updates?

See here: http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,15024.msg100522.html#msg100522

[kenzanin]

sorry English is not my primary language and iam not programmer .

iam also make some modification on AVR wizard by

• making some option default
• adding ALF, COFF and EXT-COFF debug format
• adding linker option for printf int or printf float
• adding linker option for scanf int or scanf float

this the screenshot

Before	After

please notify me for any error

<todo> adding option for programmer avrdude
thanks

[scarphin]

I also added options for programmer and debugger but no one was interested in. And CB doesn't get updated with templates.

[oBFusCATed]

I'm not embedded programmer, but if you two collaborate and produce a patch
to the template you both agree on, I can commit it. The patch will be reverted if
there is a user complaining and you don't provide him with support, of course.

In the screen shot I see removed check boxes, are they really useless?

[kenzanin]

I also added options for programmer and debugger but no one was interested in. And CB doesn't get updated with templates.

i guest that not true, iam here because i never knew someone has already make modification, otherwise i will used it rather than goggling(to much) and for hours reading codeblock wiki about wizard scripting. and i believe there many user will agree that CB default wizard for AVR is to simple for their need.
sorry if iam mistake.

In the screen shot I see removed check boxes, are they really useless?

i make that modification based on what i need most, i believe someone feel that check box is necessary otherwise it wont be there
this what iam remove form the check box and the reason
->create hex file
i remove the check box and make that default, because AVR simulator that i use VMLab, only support for hex and coff. as far as i knew
->run avr-size after build
i remove the check box and make that default, i guest i never meet someone that never care about the code size.

[scarphin]

Providing a patch won't be a problem as I've provided every patch i made. But it should be the users who will decide if a patch is ok or need enhancing and I don't know how it will be possible if they are not even committed? Anyway I'll try it again.

oBFusCATed: Check boxes are not useless and have to be made optional imo.

kenzanin: U can browse the history of my patches and enhancements to the template on this thread.

[oBFusCATed]

oBFusCATed: Check boxes are not useless and have to be made optional imo.

I've not said it is useless, I've asked why it is removed.

kenzanin: Keep in mind that all the different systems/boards have very different requirements, thus the argument I don't need it, so I'll remove it is invalid.

separate suggestion:
Have thought of making default profiles for different systems?
A combobox with the most common ones?
Maybe you need different wizard templates?

If you agree on something I have no problem with committing it, as I've already said...

[kenzanin]

kenzanin: U can browse the history of my patches and enhancements to the template on this thread.

ok thanks you

oBFusCATed: i think different wizard is the most easy option . and i agree with combo box with most common one but i still prefer using hex rather than bin. thanks you