News:

As usual while waiting for the next release - don't forget to check the nightly builds in the forum.

Main Menu

Teletype font tooooooo small

Started by tiwag, December 13, 2005, 11:53:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

280Z28

When you go to reply to a post, there is a copy of the existing posts below the reply box that you can reference. In Firefox 1.5, text that is not quoted is tiny in those replies.

Notice that thomas' quote is fine, but the other text is tiny.

[attachment deleted by admin]
78 280Z, "a few bolt-ons" - 12.71@109.04
99 Trans Am, "Daily Driver" - 525rwhp/475rwtq
Check out The Sam Zone :cool:

rickg22

:'( bwaaa... can you people agree on what needs to be changed?


Michael

Quote from: rickg22 on December 14, 2005, 07:33:18 PM
:'( bwaaa... can you people agree on what needs to be changed?

The size of the text inside the tt tags...please... :).

Michael
[url="http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png"]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png[/url]

tiwag

Quote from: rickg22 on December 14, 2005, 07:33:18 PM
:'( bwaaa... can you people agree on what needs to be changed?

only teletyped text within  [ t t ]    teletype   [ / t t ]  is too small

do you have a IE on your computer ????
then you could try it yourself maybe !

thanks a lot

thomas

Quote from: 280Z28 on December 14, 2005, 07:28:12 PMNotice that thomas' quote is fine, but the other text is tiny.
No, that is deliberate. These posts are meant to be that small.

The issue is about [ tt ] teletype text [ /tt ] which looks about like this on Internet Exploder.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

rickg22

I see no difference between FF and IE (see pic)

[attachment deleted by admin]

thomas

#21
That is because I specified size=7pt for this particular text to simulate what it looks like using IE...

Compare this!

[attachment deleted by admin]
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

rickg22

Ouch. I see your point now. Lemme see what I can do.

thomas

You could just copy the code from above ;)
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

rickg22

changing the CSS is easy. The templates, however...

thomas

Find in files... :)

Search for </head>
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

280Z28

This should just be a CSS problem :think:
78 280Z, "a few bolt-ons" - 12.71@109.04
99 Trans Am, "Daily Driver" - 525rwhp/475rwtq
Check out The Sam Zone :cool:

thomas

It is not just a CSS problem.

Internet Exploder is displaying some of the code badly. All other browsers do not have that problem. So unless you want to have the forum display nicely in IE and show ill-formatted in any other browser, you have to provide different style information to different browsers.

You have the following choices:
- conditional comments: these work reliably and are perfectly suitable in this case
- JavaScript: unreliable at best
- UserAgent: unreliable and requires changing the web server's config
- CSS hacks: these are, like their name says, hacks - no alternative
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."

280Z28

Quote from: thomas on December 15, 2005, 12:12:48 AM
It is not just a CSS problem.

Internet Exploder is displaying some of the code badly. All other browsers do not have that problem. So unless you want to have the forum display nicely in IE and show ill-formatted in any other browser, you have to provide different style information to different browsers.

You have the following choices:
- conditional comments: these work reliably and are perfectly suitable in this case
- JavaScript: unreliable at best
- UserAgent: unreliable and requires changing the web server's config
- CSS hacks: these are, like their name says, hacks - no alternative

CSS problem as in CSS not designed specifically to compensate for IE's inability to follow rules. Technically that's an IE problem, but when a site doesn't keep that in mind and forgets to make the site look right in the most popular browser, it becomes a problem with their CSS code.

IE makes me like this when I'm trying to make a site:  :x :x
78 280Z, "a few bolt-ons" - 12.71@109.04
99 Trans Am, "Daily Driver" - 525rwhp/475rwtq
Check out The Sam Zone :cool:

thomas

IE is actually no problem at all if you do not have the requirements to be pixel-precise and to have the exact same look in different browsers.

If you can live with pages looking slightly different (which they will anyway, realistically) then you can make a 100% standards compliant page which is accessible and good looking in every browser. All you need to do is provide either a fallback css or a correction css for IE and conditional comments are a really gorgeous invention for that purpose. These are certainly the best thing Microsoft ever invented.

No hacks needed, no scripts, nothing.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: Premature quotation is the root of public humiliation."