The 11 May 2014 build (9765) is out.

[Max]

I'm observing the crash on three different PC all using Windows XP SP3 adding a C++ or an .h file  file in an existing C++ project. The issue was not present in the previous nightly. I unable to find any .rpt files (where should it be located?).

The error message is


The instruction at "0x6185c452" referenced memory at "0x00000008". The memory cannot be "read".

The issue is also present is a new project (C++ Console) created using the latest nightly.

[Folco]

This nightly is rev.9765. I use a self compiled CB under Debian testing, rev.9760 (trunk, --with-contrib-plugins=all) and don't get this crash.

[Jenna]

I'm observing the crash on three different PC all using Windows XP SP3 adding a C++ or an .h file  file in an existing C++ project. The issue was not present in the previous nightly. I unable to find any .rpt files (where should it be located?).

The error message is


The instruction at "0x6185c452" referenced memory at "0x00000008". The memory cannot be "read".

The issue is also present is a new project (C++ Console) created using the latest nightly.

Did you just copy the new nightly over the old one, or did you remove the whole content of the C::B folder ?

[savya]

The download links are not working. I have tried several times over the past 12 hours. Can you post the mirror links.

[Jenna]

Try this (sourceforge.net) links:
wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc481-TDM.7z
mingwm10_gcc481-TDM.7z
CB_20140511_rev9765_win32.7z

Also corrected the links in the first post, thanks for reporting this.

[savya]

Try this (sourceforge.net) links:
wxmsw28u_gcc_cb_wx2812_gcc481-TDM.7z
mingwm10_gcc481-TDM.7z
CB_20140511_rev9765_win32.7z

Also corrected the links in the first post, thanks for reporting this.

Got it..Thanks.

[Max]

Did you just copy the new nightly over the old one, or did you remove the whole content of the C::B folder ?

I removed the whole content from the directory C:\Codeblocks where I unpacked the nightly

[carra]

I had not tried this nightly before, but I'm happy to report abbreviations are again working correctly, after the previous bug described here: http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,19117.msg131330.html#msg131330