News:

Accounts with zero posts and zero activity during the last months will be deleted periodically to fight SPAM!

Main Menu

wxWidgets 2.6 (MSW, GCC) installation instructions

Started by rickg22, April 24, 2005, 06:12:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Michael

Quote from: macwolf on March 23, 2006, 02:48:54 PM
I'm using Code::Blocks v1.0,WxWidgets 2.6.2, makefile done with gcc 3.9.0
trying to compile template from Code::Blocks.

GCC 3.9.0 :?? In Windows? AFAIK there is a candidate GCC 3.4.5 (If we exclude Ceniza's GCC 4.1.0), but 3.9.0 no. In Linux there is a GCC 3.9.0.

Best wishes,
Michael
[url="http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png"]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png[/url]

macwolf


Yop they're there... ( it is default, i just want to know if it works proprerly)
  ( comilation for MS Visual .NET 2003 works fine, though i'd rather use gcc..)

macwolf


Vlad

I download C::B that includes mingw (codeblocks-1.0rc2_mingw.exe)  and MSW setup (wxMSW-2.6.3-Setup-1.exe). After installing that I followed instructions in wiki to build MSW, I added  <MINGW>\bin; and <MINGW>\mingw32\bin; to path (where <MINGW> for me points to C:\CodeBlocks as I understand) and constantly had 'cannot exec cc1' error when trying to execute "mingw32-make -f makefile.gcc  MONOLITHIC=1 SHARED=1 UNICODE=1 BUILD=release". But when I downloaded bat file posted by MortenMacFly above and corrected paths there for my case it worked!

But actually I cannot tell what was wrong :), perhaps <MINGW> must be in the PATH too (C:\CodeBlocks for me) and <MINGW>\mingw32\bin is not needed.

oz

I am using the wxWidgets2.6.3 patch 1. This morning, I unziped the patch 2 files to the root directory of wxWidgets, and make clean then make it again, is that the correct way to apply the patch or not :shock:?

Defender

Quote from: oz on June 10, 2006, 07:09:19 AM
I am using the wxWidgets2.6.3 patch 1. This morning, I unziped the patch 2 files to the root directory of wxWidgets, and make clean then make it again, is that the correct way to apply the patch or not :shock:?
This is correct  :)