It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Many thanks to all the developers who worked so hard for this!
Great news! Congratulations!
I love this IDE !
Congratulations!
But I also wish to have a look at the "what's new" page :)
Have been waiting a long time, is the time!
a question : which version of the mingw-gcc ?
TDM build : 4.4.1
Wonderful !!!
Congratulations for this huge work !
edit -> Wow, Debian repository is already updated, thanks Jens !
Congratulations and thank you all very much! :D
When and where the party will be? ;)
Congrats and my deepest thanks to the developers of THE BEST crossportable IDE there is.
And to think it's free (in every sense)...
Ken
:D :D :D
Awesome!!
Thanks to all the developers who have worked hard to make this happen.
Congratulations!
An official release is important in my quest to promote this IDE to whoever I know :)
Now comes the job recompiling some plugins, but that is quite easy based on this excellent wiki:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Linking_the_plugin_to_a_Nightly_Build
Looking forward to trying to solve this issue:
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12553.0.html
After that this IDE is unmatched in so many ways.
Thank you all :D
Quote from: mandrav on May 30, 2010, 03:23:55 PM
It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
Great news~ I love CB! THX and honor TO CB developers!
Quote from: SharkCZ on May 31, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
Quote from: mandrav on May 30, 2010, 03:23:55 PM
It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
The debian source archive does not contain additional or special stuff that is not in svn (except for the docs subdirectory).
Quote from: SharkCZ on May 31, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
You can use SVN (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/7) and a dist snapshot meanwhile,
until the source tarball download has been fixed...
svn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/codeblocks/tags/10.05 codeblocks-10.05
cd codeblocks-10.05
sed -e 's/8.02/10.05/g' -i.orig update_revision.sh
sed -e 's/\/\/\(#define RELEASE "10.05"\)/\1/' -i.orig src/src/appglobals.h
./bootstrap && ./configure
make dist
Should make a codeblocks-10.05svn6285.tar.bz2
(which is the same as r6282, only tagged "10.05").
Congrats to all the team!!!
Great job!!!
Quote from: jens on May 31, 2010, 11:42:58 AM
Quote from: SharkCZ on May 31, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
Quote from: mandrav on May 30, 2010, 03:23:55 PM
It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
The debian source archive does not contain additional or special stuff that is not in svn (except for the docs subdirectory).
But the real source tarball (codeblocks_10.05-1.tar.gz) is inside another tarball (codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2) and that complicates the unpacking and verifying a bit.
Quote from: afb on May 31, 2010, 11:47:06 AM
Quote from: SharkCZ on May 31, 2010, 11:09:54 AM
Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.
You can use SVN (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/7) and a dist snapshot meanwhile,
until the source tarball download has been fixed...
svn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/codeblocks/tags/10.05 codeblocks-10.05
cd codeblocks-10.05
sed -e 's/8.02/10.05/g' -i.orig update_revision.sh
sed -e 's/\/\/\(#define RELEASE "10.05"\)/\1/' -i.orig src/src/appglobals.h
./bootstrap && ./configure
make dist
Should make a codeblocks-10.05svn6285.tar.bz2
(which is the same as r6282, only tagged "10.05").
That would be great, thanks.
Hi,
Congratulations, and thank you for this great work !
SF.net needs updated; still has 8.02 release as the most current.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/
Quote from: stahta01 on May 31, 2010, 04:00:37 PM
SF.net needs updated; still has 8.02 release as the most current.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/
I think the page on sf.net should at least give a message saying
the main codeblocks source repo was moved to Project page at BerliOS (http://developer.berlios.de/projects/codeblocks/)
Congratulations!
Quote from: mandrav on May 30, 2010, 03:23:55 PM
It's now official :)
Head over to the downloads (http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads) section to get it!
Many thanks to all the developers who worked so hard for this!
Hi,
It looks just fine on Windows 7, except for one small glitch which I am noting here for anybody having the same problem.
I installed the complete package which includes TDM-MingGW and that went well. However when trying to rebuild an existing project, the default compiler was not found. I had to point the Codeblocks to the installation folder for MinGW:
Settings >> Compiler and debugger... >> Toolchain executables Tab
Click the auto-detect button. It should load the path C:\Program Files\CodeBlocks\MinGW (or you might have to enter it manually).
I just discovered Code::Blocks recently and I find it very intuitive and quick to use. I'm glad to see it is actively maintained.
Best wishes
Congratulations to the Development team and the whole C:B Community!
great,thanks
Just thought I'd let you know that the 10.05 deb packages don't work on Ubuntu 10.04 with the default wxWidgets (e.g. without the wx repository):
luke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
I think because the deb packages were compiled with wx 2.8.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 comes with 2.8.0. I don't suppose it's possible to get some packages compiled for vanilla 10.04? Especially as it's an LTS release, it would make it a lot easier for people to try Codeblocks.
Congratulations to the developers!!! :D I like the new code::blocks logo but can you please change the file icons?
Quote from: Kazade on June 01, 2010, 12:46:14 PM
Just thought I'd let you know that the 10.05 deb packages don't work on Ubuntu 10.04 with the default wxWidgets (e.g. without the wx repository):
luke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
I think because the deb packages were compiled with wx 2.8.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 comes with 2.8.0. I don't suppose it's possible to get some packages compiled for vanilla 10.04? Especially as it's an LTS release, it would make it a lot easier for people to try Codeblocks.
Ubuntu comes with 2.8.10 and the packages are compiled with 2.8.10 (from apt.wxwidgets.org), but the binaries shipped by ubuntu are not compatible with the binaries provided by apt.wxwidgets.org.
That's known and desribed at several places in the forum.
There is also a note on the download-site:
Quote from: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
NOTE: The Debian packages have been linked against wxGTK-2.8.10 from apt.wxwidgets.org (lenny-wx).To successfully install these packages, you have to add the wxWidgets repository for your distribution in your /etc/apt/sources.list (e.g. deb http://apt.wxwidgets.org/ lenny-wx main). Besides Debian lenny, apt.wxwidgets.org also supports all Ubuntu distributions: dapper, edgy, etch, feisty, gutsy, hardy, interpid, jaunty, karmic and lucid.
and on my (nightly-)server:
Quote from: http://apt.jenslody.de/The packages are known to work on ubuntu too. You have to use the appropriate wxwidgets-packages in this case, see here (http://wiki.wxpython.org/InstallingOnUbuntuOrDebian) for details.
If you want to use my packages on ubuntu 9.10 (karmic koala) or newer you have to use the aprpriate packages provided by http://apt.wxwidgets.org (http://apt.wxwidgets.org) , because the wx2.8.10 packages from ubuntu are not compatible with the packages from http://apt.wxwidgets.org (http://apt.wxwidgets.org). You should be able to use the new wxWidgets 2.8.11 packages without problems.
There exists also a repository containing packages for ubuntu, maintained by pasgui, see here (http://lgp203.free.fr/spip/spip.php?article1) how to use it.
EDIT:and you should know about that issue:
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401 (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401) and following.
This can not be fixed with packages for debian.
I could compile ubuntu-packages also, but there is already a repo for ubuntu that works as far as I know.
Why was the Help plugin not included?
Quote from: jfpjr2 on June 01, 2010, 05:51:50 PM
Why was the Help plugin not included?
It *is* included, hence you probably forgot to enable in during installation. BTW: Mentioning the platform would be extremely useful.
but i am using windows 7 so which 1 should i download?
Quote from: lolsee2 on June 02, 2010, 07:35:59 AM
but i am using windows 7 so which 1 should i download?
I think the windows-installer should do it (even if win7 is not listed explicitely).
Quote from: jens on June 01, 2010, 12:54:33 PM
Quote from: Kazade on June 01, 2010, 12:46:14 PM
Just thought I'd let you know that the 10.05 deb packages don't work on Ubuntu 10.04 with the default wxWidgets (e.g. without the wx repository):
luke@Argon:~$ codeblocks
codeblocks: relocation error: /usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.0: symbol _Z18wxSafeConvertWX2MBPKw, version WXU_2.8.2 not defined in file libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 with link time reference
I think because the deb packages were compiled with wx 2.8.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 comes with 2.8.0. I don't suppose it's possible to get some packages compiled for vanilla 10.04? Especially as it's an LTS release, it would make it a lot easier for people to try Codeblocks.
Ubuntu comes with 2.8.10 and the packages are compiled with 2.8.10 (from apt.wxwidgets.org), but the binaries shipped by ubuntu are not compatible with the binaries provided by apt.wxwidgets.org.
Ah, I was under the impression it was a version difference, not incompatible binaries.
Quote from: jens on June 01, 2010, 12:54:33 PM
EDIT:
and you should know about that issue:
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401 (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12098.msg82401.html#msg82401) and following.
This can not be fixed with packages for debian.
I could compile ubuntu-packages also, but there is already a repo for ubuntu that works as far as I know.
Yeah, I knew there was an issue. My message above was just a suggestion as a large number of people downloading the Debian packages would be Ubuntu users, an Ubuntu 10.04 compatible version on the downloads page would be nice to have.
Damn good work! :D
A big step forward.
Is there any page describing what's new in this release? Like changelog, release notes or something?
Quote from: geckon on June 04, 2010, 11:46:43 AM
Is there any page describing what's new in this release? Like changelog, release notes or something?
not afaik, theres the logs in the nightlies ofc.. as well as in the svn/git i guess
(but note: about 2 years of development since last release)
well done!
Quote from: Hans Henrik on June 05, 2010, 12:29:59 AM
Quote from: geckon on June 04, 2010, 11:46:43 AM
Is there any page describing what's new in this release? Like changelog, release notes or something?
not afaik, theres the logs in the nightlies ofc.. as well as in the svn/git i guess
It's a pity. I'd love to know what I can expect before I upgrade my C::B. And I believe I'm not alone. I don't consider possible to search all the logs for two years back.
Writing short news about new versions of free software (for OSS servers) is harder this way too...
Great :D Thanks for your hard work.
May I suggest that you update your sourceforge page to point at the new release. It seems that many people are still going there to download, and the downloads on there are still for the old 8.02 release.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/
Quote from: geckon on June 05, 2010, 04:57:36 PM
It's a pity. I'd love to know what I can expect before I upgrade my C::B. And I believe I'm not alone. I don't consider possible to search all the logs for two years back.
Writing short news about new versions of free software (for OSS servers) is harder this way too...
Major thing that have change:
1. Switched from wxFNB to wxAui => splitting files is improved
2. Lots of improvements in the Code completion
3. CB is build and ships on windows gcc 4.4.1 from TDM
4. There is a std::vector script for the debugger
5. Lots of bugs are fixed
8.02 was too long ago to remember all the major changes....
A list of new plug-ins and what the do would be a good thing; i have no idea if it already exists.
Tim S.
Regarding plugins, I'm surprised DoxyBlocks wasn't included in 10.05. For me at least, it's been working flawlessly.
Can I ask someone to upload the pure source package to the download site?
This will ease the work for the non debian packagers.
(I've got a complaint on irc from a slackware guy)
Quote from: oBFusCATed on June 07, 2010, 07:57:02 PM
Can I ask someone to upload the pure source package to the download site?
What about:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-0.fc13.src.rpm
Or:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2
???
Nobody rote what was new in the build. Would be grate to have something similar to wxFormBuilder instead of present day wxSmith + automatic installation of new controls. Similar to Delphi/Lazarus project. On the other hand Lazarus may be extended to C++ or C# and code::blocks might pass away.
Meanwhile it is a grate engine and I like to use it in cross platform development. That is why would be grate to have the same project for both windows and linux development. Today I use separate projects for Windows and for Linux.
Would be grate as well to have auto updater under the windows for the latest C::B, mingw-gcc and wxWidgets. Today I can update C::B and other related projects in OpenSUSE but not in Windows.
Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 PM
What about:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-0.fc13.src.rpm
this is not listed here: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/25
Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 PM
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2
???
OK, here is the original complain:
Quote
(2010-06-07 16:38:55) Aldaron: Anyway, I was mutilating the slackware build script for the new version. And EVERYTHING was changed after the last version..
(2010-06-07 16:41:13) Aldaron: Details: it makes no sense that the only source release version is "10.05-1debian". That's ugly, also it doesn't even uncompress to a dir with the same version, but to a dir called "src/". Inside is another source package with another version, which uncompresses to a dir with a third version tag.
(2010-06-07 16:43:47) Aldaron: Additionally, gz -> bz2, except the inner package.
(2010-06-07 16:44:24) Aldaron: I already forgot if there was something else, but making a script to automatically build and package the software is right now as hard as it gets
(2010-06-07 16:44:54) Aldaron: except for the fact that Code::Blocks itself compiles nicely, but that's because the code is good quality
(2010-06-07 16:46:28) Aldaron: so, please put some sensible version tag to the zip file and have it decompress to a dir with the *same* version (and software name), and it's much easier for everyone
(2010-06-07 20:02:26) obfuscated: Aldaron: if you have the svn tree checked out, you can do make dist and you'll have a source tarball
(2010-06-07 20:12:54) Aldaron: obfuscated: yea, I did find that out.
(2010-06-07 20:13:44) Aldaron: but I don't think it makes sense to make all users of all non-debian distros to do that
(2010-06-07 20:15:03) Aldaron: right now it seems that source only works for debian (okay, it's not debian-specific, but it kinda claims to be)
The gentoo people might have the same complain...
I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
Ubuntu 10.04
first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.
codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings. Because compiler settings for debug/release mode are different, we have to go into "settings" to select options for compiler, and go into "build option" to set up other options. could you please let me know if this can be modified by users or not? or let me know the advantages of such change?
thank you.
Quote from: eweb2009 on June 08, 2010, 05:38:55 AM
Ubuntu 10.04
first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.
codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings.
No such changes between 8.02 and 10.05, the only exception might be for projects with custom makefiles (I don't remember exactly how it was in 8.02).
But in these cases the compiler settings are totally ignored, because the makefile does it and C::B does not know anything about it.
Quote from: jens on June 07, 2010, 11:13:03 PM
I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
Here it is:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-src.tar.bz2 (http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-src.tar.bz2)
Jens, Thank you :)
Congratulations!
:D
I just registered here to tell you this:
I think it's awesome that you released a new version of Code::Blocks - my favourite IDE. I'm running the new version fine under Ubuntu 9.10 and Windows 7 64bit. I really like how you added features but left the basic functionality the same so I don't have to change my old habits :-) Thanks!
Whoa a long time I didn't come here great news!
OpenSUSE 11.2, Mandriva 2010 32 bit release binaries are up. Visit
Quotehttp://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
for details.
Thank you so much!
Code::Blocks works fine under Windows 98 / ME. A german interface will be nice.
congratulations...
Quote from: CryptonNite on July 25, 2010, 11:05:45 AM
Code::Blocks works fine under Windows 98 / ME. A german interface will be nice.
I think the debugger won't work correctly on pre XP windows, not possible to fix it....
awesome!
why is the installer 70 MB (i think it was about 15 MB before)? just curious.
Quote from: blacklockjames on September 18, 2010, 11:27:19 PM
awesome!
why is the installer 70 MB (i think it was about 15 MB before)? just curious.
C::B itself is "only" 23.3 MB, the 70 MB installer includes MinGW.
One cause for the larger installer of pure C::B are the included docs.
Quote from: jens on September 18, 2010, 11:38:15 PM
C::B itself is "only" 23.3 MB, the 70 MB installer includes MinGW.
right, but i used the mingw installer before, too, and it was substantially smaller, i think about 15 or 20 MB.
so maybe it's just the docs, then (must be some very long docs)?
I meant the C::B docs, and they are included in both packages (of course).
So it's the MinGW installer.
Hi! I cannot download the latest codeblocks release as a debian package from berilos. Is there any mirrors on other sites?
Quote from: mav on October 02, 2010, 03:02:30 PM
Hi! I cannot download the latest codeblocks release as a debian package from berilos. Is there any mirrors on other sites?
You can download the release or nightly packages from my repo.
For instructions see: http://apt.jenslody.de/ (http://apt.jenslody.de/) .
Yes, congratulations! I am a newcomer to Code::Blocks, but I must say, so far it looks impressive. I've heard a lot of good things, so I'm looking forward to my experiences with it. Enjoy everyone, and happy coding!
please answer the question: where can I download code::blocks 10.5 binaries for Windows (berliOS server doesn't work)
upd. jens, thank you very much
Quote from: cb_user on November 11, 2010, 09:12:27 PM
please answer the question: where can I download code::blocks 10.5 binaries for Windows (berliOS server doesn't work)
You can use
http://apt.jenslody.de/downloads/cb-release-10.05/codeblocks-10.05-setup.exe (http://apt.jenslody.de/downloads/cb-release-10.05/codeblocks-10.05-setup.exe)
or
http://apt.jenslody.de/downloads/cb-release-10.05/codeblocks-10.05mingw-setup.exe (http://apt.jenslody.de/downloads/cb-release-10.05/codeblocks-10.05mingw-setup.exe)
UPDATE:
We have re-activated the downloads at sourceforge.net (http://sourceforge.net/projects/codeblocks/files/Binaries/10.05/) at least for the 10/05 release binaries.
Greetings,
The new release looks great.
I want to let you know that I was unable to download the debian 64-bit from sourceforge. I was expecting an 18.8M file but only get a 3.3M corrupted file.
Nevertheless, the version with the dbg's included downloaded just fine, and I probably would miss them anyway. The wxSmith upgrade is also wonderful. All kinds of new controls to play with.
FYI: C::B 10.05 running fine on Xubuntu 9.10 (Karmic) AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core, using wxWidgets wxGTK 2.8.11.0 and GNU gcc compiler 4:4.4.1.
Thanks again.
Paul
Quote from: pjoseph on January 12, 2011, 06:31:21 AM
I want to let you know that I was unable to download the debian 64-bit from sourceforge. I was expecting an 18.8M file but only get a 3.3M corrupted file.
Thank you for pointing this out. I have re-uploaded that file, which should hopefully be complete now.
Unluckily, the upload mechanism at SF is not very reliable. I have 1Gbps upstream bandwidth and get between 50 and 100 kB per second on SF, about half of my uploads time out or fail otherwise. And, you never know if the server discards or keeps a partial file that failed. Common sense would tell you that if an upload failed, the server should always discard the file, but oh well. It's not what seems to happen.
Hi all,
my question is specifically for the developers and the people who really make the project live, decide things or have their say in them: is there a reason why releases are so far in between?
Please, don't take it as a criticism, I just mean that I am puzzled by the release schedule (or apparent lack thereof). All the more since I built a trunk version and had a notification that some (I guess third-party) plugins like wxSmith or cccc are not loaded because of a version problem.
This is more of a question than whining so please don't go all out on me. Thanks.
The not loading error happens, when a plugin is build with different version of the SDK, than the one C::B is using.
To fix this problem rebuild all contrib pluigns (using the appropriate workspace file).
Also if you're on windows you can use the Nightly builds.
Quote from: vodoomoth on March 06, 2011, 04:04:52 PMis there a reason why releases are so far in between?
Hi,
I do have the same question. On a personal level I
really don't mind using the regularly released nightlies (I just switched to the April's one, actually ;)), but I know some people whom I just can't convince to switch or stick to Code::Blocks just because they "have those issues with the latest stable and [they] don't want to hear about installing something called nightly". So I believe this would be good for the project to release "stable" versions more often, even if those are just glorified nightlies (which are better than the 10.05 stable anyway). Well, just my 2 cents, as I said I'm happy with the monthly nightly for myself ;)
I think many of us, including me, agree with patheticcockroach. Releasing the "glorified nightlies" more often would definitely make Code::Blocks more popular.
In general:
I think what all of you miss is that a release is not as simple as putting it into an installer.
What we are trying to achieve is also a table SDK. For plugin devs nothing is worse than often releases that always change the SDK interface. That's also what differs a nightly from a proper release.
Are there any important non-svn-contrib plugins in the wild?
Quote from: oBFusCATed on April 14, 2011, 04:53:14 PM
Are there any important non-svn-contrib plugins in the wild?
I think the spell check plugin is quite important. :D
Quote from: oBFusCATed on April 14, 2011, 04:53:14 PM
Are there any important non-svn-contrib plugins in the wild?
How can you know? I know at least about two closed source plugins which have such dependencies. I bet there are more.
When will the next stable version will be released... I'm waiting to see some feature to override all other IDE's and I really love Code::Blocks... thanx to developers..
When it is ready as usual:)
When will it be ready? -> When it is out:)
does the debug support watching __float128 types?
I get "error reading variable"
Around 2 years since the last stable release. Still no Stable release :(
Quote from: saad749 on July 04, 2012, 03:54:30 PM
Around 2 years since the last stable release. Still no Stable release :(
Current nightlies are stable. Way more stable and feature-rich than 10/05.
Quote from: vanangamudi on January 22, 2012, 03:42:38 PM
When will the next stable version will be released... I'm waiting to see some feature to override all other IDE's and I really love Code::Blocks... thanx to developers..
I am waiting for
some developments on the IDE, too.
It's good, but can be better. The error tracing is satisfactory either,
but it again has to be improved. Code::Blocks rocks overall. I am new of using it,
and I'm lovin' it. ::)
Quote from: leosubhadeep on August 05, 2012, 12:01:51 AM
Quote from: vanangamudi on January 22, 2012, 03:42:38 PM
When will the next stable version will be released... I'm waiting to see some feature to override all other IDE's and I really love Code::Blocks... thanx to developers..
I am waiting for some developments on the IDE, too. It's good, but can be better. The error tracing is satisfactory either, but it again has to be improved. Code::Blocks rocks overall. I am new of using it, and I'm lovin' it. ::)
See the nightly builds forum: http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,20.0.html (http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/board,20.0.html)
I removed the ad from your signature.
Our forum rules do not allow commercial ads in signature or elsewhere.
If the nightlys' are more stable than the current release, why not stop and make a release, or maybe create an installer to install the nightlys'. I don't want to have to guess that I'm updating everything okay and mess up the build environment. I just want to run setup and have it find the existing version and offer to upgrade it. ??
So use the 10.05.
Code::Blocks is a free software. The goal of a free software programmer is to improve the software itself, not to provide a safe way to install it for you. It should request a too huge effort to test all possible configurations. If your priority is the safety of your environment, use the 10.05 version, or use another soft.
At least you could try with a sandbox, if you absolutely want a new feature which isn't present in the 10.05 release. But that's at your own risk.
Hey,
Just downloaded windows 8 and now my compiler does not work anymore.
GNU GCC Compiler is what I have. And using the newest version so 10.05 or whatever.
Does anyone know why this is happening??
Thanks
Quote from: spencerkingston19 on November 02, 2012, 06:50:49 PM
Hey,
Just downloaded windows 8 and now my compiler does not work anymore.
GNU GCC Compiler is what I have. And using the newest version so 10.05 or whatever.
Does anyone know why this is happening??
Thanks
Do not post the same question three times please.
If you use the MinGW shipped with the 10.05 release, I strongly suggest to update it to a newer version.
I suggest: http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/ (http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/).
You probably need to correct your toolchain after the installation.
I also suggest to remove the old MinGW compiler from your system.
The prerelease of win8 worked with C::B (not tested with 10.05) and TDM's MinGW, but there might be some "security" features that have changed and prevent the compiler from working without some tweaking.