News:

As usual while waiting for the next release - don't forget to check the nightly builds in the forum.

Main Menu

Code::Blocks 10.05 has arrived

Started by mandrav, May 30, 2010, 03:23:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

oBFusCATed

Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 PM
What about:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-0.fc13.src.rpm
this is not listed here: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/25

Quote from: MortenMacFly on June 07, 2010, 09:57:21 PM
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-1debian-src.tar.bz2
???

OK, here is the original complain:
Quote
(2010-06-07 16:38:55) Aldaron: Anyway, I was mutilating the slackware build script for the new version. And EVERYTHING was changed after the last version..
(2010-06-07 16:41:13) Aldaron: Details: it makes no sense that the only source release version is "10.05-1debian". That's ugly, also it doesn't even uncompress to a dir with the same version, but to a dir called "src/". Inside is another source package with another version, which uncompresses to a dir with a third version tag.
(2010-06-07 16:43:47) Aldaron: Additionally, gz -> bz2, except the inner package.
(2010-06-07 16:44:24) Aldaron: I already forgot if there was something else, but making a script to automatically build and package the software is right now as hard as it gets
(2010-06-07 16:44:54) Aldaron: except for the fact that Code::Blocks itself compiles nicely, but that's because the code is good quality
(2010-06-07 16:46:28) Aldaron: so, please put some sensible version tag to the zip file and have it decompress to a dir with the *same* version (and software name), and it's much easier for everyone
(2010-06-07 20:02:26) obfuscated: Aldaron: if you have the svn tree checked out, you can do make dist and you'll have a source tarball
(2010-06-07 20:12:54) Aldaron: obfuscated: yea, I did find that out.
(2010-06-07 20:13:44) Aldaron: but I don't think it makes sense to make all users of all non-debian distros to do that
(2010-06-07 20:15:03) Aldaron: right now it seems that source only works for debian (okay, it's not debian-specific, but it kinda claims to be)

The gentoo people might have the same complain...
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

Jenna

I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.

eweb2009

Ubuntu 10.04

first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.

codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings. Because compiler settings for debug/release mode are different, we have to go into "settings" to select options for compiler, and go into "build option" to set up other options. could you please let me know if this can be modified by users or not? or let me know the advantages of such change?

thank you.

Jenna

Quote from: eweb2009 on June 08, 2010, 05:38:55 AM
Ubuntu 10.04

first of all, very appreciate your efforts in improving this IDE for us.

codeblocks 8.02 puts compiler settings under build option, that is a convenient way as compiler's debug/release mode can be set up directly under build option. but in version 10.05 compiler settings is moved to "global" settings.

No such changes between 8.02 and 10.05, the only exception might be for projects with custom makefiles (I don't remember exactly how it was in 8.02).
But in these cases the compiler settings are totally ignored, because the makefile does it and C::B does not know anything about it.

Jenna

Quote from: jens on June 07, 2010, 11:13:03 PM
I hope I find the time to create a clean (non-debian and without the docs I added for debian) source tar-ball tomorrow.
If I have uploaded it to berlios I post it here.
Here it is:
http://prdownload.berlios.de/codeblocks/codeblocks-10.05-src.tar.bz2

oBFusCATed

(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

mushakk


cherry

I just registered here to tell you this:

I think it's awesome that you released a new version of Code::Blocks - my favourite IDE. I'm running the new version fine under Ubuntu 9.10 and Windows 7 64bit. I really like how you added features but left the basic functionality the same so I don't have to change my old habits :-) Thanks!

JGM

Whoa a long time I didn't come here great news!

Biplab

OpenSUSE 11.2, Mandriva 2010 32 bit release binaries are up. Visit
Quotehttp://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
for details.
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

Enjo


CryptonNite

Code::Blocks works fine under Windows 98 / ME. A german interface will be nice.

oiooooio


oBFusCATed

Quote from: CryptonNite on July 25, 2010, 11:05:45 AM
Code::Blocks works fine under Windows 98 / ME. A german interface will be nice.
I think the debugger won't work correctly on pre XP windows, not possible to fix it....
(most of the time I ignore long posts)
[strangers don't send me private messages, I'll ignore them; post a topic in the forum, but first read the rules!]

JayArby

awesome!
why is the installer 70 MB (i think it was about 15 MB before)? just curious.