Code::Blocks 10.05 has arrived

[mandrav]

It's now official
Head over to the downloads section to get it!

Many thanks to all the developers who worked so hard for this!

[ollydbg]

Great news! Congratulations!

I love this IDE !

[198710]

Congratulations!
But I also wish to have a look at the "what's new" page

[nanyu]

Have been waiting a long time, is the time!

a question : which version of the  mingw-gcc ?

[killerbot]

TDM build : 4.4.1

[Folco]

Wonderful !!!

Congratulations for this huge work !


edit -> Wow, Debian repository is already updated, thanks Jens !

[test_test]

Congratulations and thank you all very much!

[kencamargo]

When and where the party will be?

Congrats and my deepest thanks to the developers of THE BEST crossportable IDE there is.

And to think it's free (in every sense)...

Ken

[jsibarani]

 
Awesome!!
Thanks to all the developers who have worked hard to make this happen.

[Loaden]

Congratulations!

[Bonanza]

An official release is important in my quest to promote this IDE to whoever I know

Now comes the job recompiling some plugins, but that is quite easy based on this excellent wiki:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Linking_the_plugin_to_a_Nightly_Build

Looking forward to trying to solve this issue:
http://forums.next.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12553.0.html

After that this IDE is unmatched in so many ways.

Thank you all

[SharkCZ]

It's now official
Head over to the downloads section to get it!

Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.

[yuk.f]

Great news~ I love CB! THX and honor TO CB developers!

[Jenna]

It's now official
Head over to the downloads section to get it!

Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.

The debian source archive does not contain additional or special stuff that is not in svn (except for the docs subdirectory).

[afb]

Can we get also a plain (non-debian) source archive? it's not optimal for other distros to base their packages on the debian source archive containing additional stuff. And I think the EN and DE docs should be packaged separately too.

You can use SVN and a dist snapshot meanwhile,
until the source tarball download has been fixed...

Code Select Expand

svn checkout svn://svn.berlios.de/codeblocks/tags/10.05 codeblocks-10.05
cd codeblocks-10.05
sed -e 's/8.02/10.05/g' -i.orig update_revision.sh
sed -e 's/\/\/\(#define RELEASE "10.05"\)/\1/' -i.orig src/src/appglobals.h
./bootstrap && ./configure
make dist


Should make a codeblocks-10.05svn6285.tar.bz2
(which is the same as r6282, only tagged "10.05").