Unofficial Code::Blocks installer for Windows (svn 10408)

[ollydbg]

I hope he won't consider it!
The GDB_MI plugin is not intended for use by users. It is too unfinished!

Which part of the GDB_MI plugin is unfinished. Can you write some texts or guidelines like:
Something is finished, and something is unfinished, so that other user/developer can help to improve.
The best place would be in this thread. Thanks.

[oBFusCATed]

Done.

[ptDev]

I made a local build, but I'll refrain from distributing the GBD-MI plugin until oBFusCATed tells us it's ready to be tested by more people.

I was making a little UUID tool for C::B today (akin to the "Create GUID" tool for Visual Studio), it'll probably be distributed with the next installer.

[ollydbg]

I made a local build, but I'll refrain from distributing the GBD-MI plugin until oBFusCATed tells us it's ready to be tested by more people.

Ok, I see.

BTW: Would you like/plan to add some more wxsmith control like wxSTC, wxMathplot in your release? It looks like they were in the C::B SVN, but not released by any distributor. (I'm currently asking the reason here: The reason of not install wxMathplot wxsmith control by default?)

[ptDev]

BTW: Would you like/plan to add some more wxsmith control like wxSTC, wxMathplot in your release? It looks like they were in the C::B SVN, but not released by any distributor. (I'm currently asking the reason here: The reason of not install wxMathplot wxsmith control by default?)

I did find it strange that after wxSTC was checked in, no additional modules were getting built in the workspace, but then I forgot about this after a while. I'll see if it was a simple oversight. That being the case, I could make a patch.

[immm008]

great job especially for those who dont know how to build svn version like me,haha ;D
come on!

[ptDev]

After several months, a new unofficial installer surfaces: Get it here while it's hot!

[immm008]

good job,especially the added offline c++ reference,thanks

[Dreamy]

Hi. Any chance for a wx 3.0-RC1 build? 

[ptDev]

Hi. Any chance for a wx 3.0-RC1 build? 

Working on it...

[oBFusCATed]

Hi. Any chance for a wx 3.0-RC1 build? 

Hm, C::B built with wx3.0 is only for testing purposes and for people who want to improve C::B built with wx3.0. The general users should not use it for their own sake

[Dreamy]

That's not so good news, I hoped you switch to 3.0 as soon as it's final.

[oBFusCATed]

Why? We won't switch probably, but start to support both for some time (probably 1-2 years) then we'll switch.

[Dreamy]

Well wx 3.0 promises some nice improvements, such as cleaner string handling, GTK+ 3 and Cocoa ports and seems generally cleaner and bugproofed (if such thing ever existed). Maybe I'm just overexcited.

[oBFusCATed]

Hm, bugproof is a bold claim, in fact C::B runs way worse with wx2.9 than wx2.8.
The really interesting version (if everything goes to plan of course) will be 3.2, there we'll have the feature to move aui windows between notebooks, which is one really needed feature in C::B.