The 21 May 2011 build (7152) is out.

[grf]

What's wrong with the link on the first page on codeblocks.org (see image attached)?!

1. It's too small.
2. "Nightly" may be a very common term for programmers of Open Source projects but not for their users (even if they are also programmers). The common way to get software is to go to the "Download" page and download the binary. And there is no advice to use the "Nightly" (or better: to install the setup und update it with a Nightly).
3. An advice is missing which informs the user about the "Nightly strategy" of the Codeblocks project. Even if the user knows the term "Nigthly", "his" meaning of the term may be "some experimental, unstable packages".

[MortenMacFly]

1. [...]
2. [...]
3. [...]

Iv'e updated the pages at:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads
and:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
...to clarify a bit more. That should really be enough now to close this topic.

[grf]

Iv'e updated the pages at:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads
and:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
...to clarify a bit more. That should really be enough now to close this topic.

Fine. 

[patheticcockroach]

...to clarify a bit more. That should really be enough now to close this topic.

Fine. 

Indeed, much clearer now

[marco_silva85]

1. [...]
2. [...]
3. [...]

Iv'e updated the pages at:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads
and:
http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26
...to clarify a bit more. That should really be enough now to close this topic.

in addition, I think you should link the unofficial installer from ptDev too, he deserves. People from Windows are used to installing apps and his installer is perfect and up to date.
but anyway thats better, thanks

[xazax]

+1 for marco_silva85