Why C::B over write gdb's set print element value?

[ollydbg]

I see when start gdb, it is:

Code Select Expand


set print elements -1

This cause some problems, such as when a large String is put as a function argument(maybe, the wxString was loaded from a txt file), this will show all the contents of the String in the debugger log.

So, I think we can leave it as gdb default value is 200.
See:
Print Settings - Debugging with GDB

[Jenna]

You should say, that it is only for the debugger-branch, not for trunk.

What I don't understand is, what the value of -1 means, because a value of 0 means unlimited.

[ollydbg]

You should say, that it is only for the debugger-branch, not for trunk.

Oh, sorry, I use only debugger branch these days.

What I don't understand is, what the value of -1 means, because a value of 0 means unlimited.

Yes, as the gdb document said, it should be 0 (not -1).

[oBFusCATed]

This is the reason:
http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/codeblocks/branches/wxpropgrid_debugger/src/plugins/debuggergdb/gdb_driver.cpp?op=revision&rev=6393&peg=7585

ollydbg: can you give an example code?

[ollydbg]

ollydbg: can you give an example code?

The sample code below:

int main()
{
    char * p = new char[4000];
    p[1]=4;//set breakpoint here
    return 0;
}

You can just "print p" at the breakpoint, then gdb will show many trash.

Also, if the pointer p is passed to a function call. then when you run a "backtrace", the trash will be shown too.

[oBFusCATed]

OK, I've added a way to control the value of the printed elements.
See Debug -> Information -> Print Elements.

[ollydbg]

OK, I've added a way to control the value of the printed elements.
See Debug -> Information -> Print Elements.

Thanks for implement this feature, I will test it ASAP.

[ollydbg]

The variable name:

Code Select Expand

m_printElements
should be:

Code Select Expand

m_PrintElements
right?

[oBFusCATed]

I prefer the first version.

[ollydbg]

I prefer the first version.

Me too. 
But the C::B's coding standard （some page in the wiki) said we should use second version.

[MortenMacFly]

But the C::B's coding standard （some page in the wiki) said we should use second version.

This one:
http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=Coding_style