the code editor edge so strange(ugly)

[icequan233]

I doubt you can solve it without changing any code. It is most probably a bug that triggers in hidpi environments.

Thanks, it doesn't matter. Maybe this is the chance of study(I am just a student, and my teacher teach me learn what you need). But it seems difficult, can you give me more suggestions, I can't locate the problem with gdb .

[icequan233]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

[stahta01]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

The wxWidgets 3.1 is a development version so it might be missing something.

Tim S.

[icequan233]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

The wxWidgets 3.1 is a development version so it might be missing something.

Tim S.

Yes, I saw the official post, although they released the 3.1.x , it is still a development version. Confused!

[stahta01]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

The wxWidgets 3.1 is a development version so it might be missing something.

Tim S.

Yes, I saw the official post, although they released the 3.1.x , it is still a development version. Confused!

Like many FLOSS projects they use this pattern.

2.6 production
2.7 development
2.8 production
2.9 development
3.0 production
3.1 development

There is a name for this pattern; but, I do NOT remember it.

Tim S.

[yvesdm3000]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

The wxWidgets 3.1 is a development version so it might be missing something.

Tim S.

Yes, I saw the official post, although they released the 3.1.x , it is still a development version. Confused!

Like many FLOSS projects they use this pattern.

2.6 production
2.7 development
2.8 production
2.9 development
3.0 production
3.1 development

There is a name for this pattern; but, I do NOT remember it.

Tim S.

Linux kernel development started doing this back in the 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4,2.5,2.6 days.

Yves

[icequan233]

By the way, is it possible that beacuse the wx3.1.0 support scaling but it is incompatible with hidpi ? if possible, the next version
of codeblocks will be waited for while(just my thought), and if so, I must admit I can't slove it for now.

The wxWidgets 3.1 is a development version so it might be missing something.

Tim S.

Yes, I saw the official post, although they released the 3.1.x , it is still a development version. Confused!

Like many FLOSS projects they use this pattern.

2.6 production
2.7 development
2.8 production
2.9 development
3.0 production
3.1 development

There is a name for this pattern; but, I do NOT remember it.

Tim S.

Linux kernel development started doing this back in the 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4,2.5,2.6 days.

Yves

oh,I think I understant it now. I guess this pattern can help developers find bugs and create a patch to slove problems.
Beacause the amount of users is much more than developers, so that the bug can be easily found, which must improve the efficiency of development. Right?
             I'd like to improve the efficiency, as a user .