Errors building C::B rev2688

[mdelfede]

I 'm currently installing SuSE 10.1 to see the problem myself (and attempt to fix it).

You can also install the GCC only side-by-side to your GCC... Install SuSe distro only to fix a bug is quite time-expensive !  :shock:

Ciao

Max

[SharkCZ]

Is the problem with "no matching function for call to 'Push(SQVM*&, const wxArrayString&)'" reported into GCC Bugzilla? I am preparing RPMs for inclusion into Fedora Extras and this is a blocker.

[killerbot]

In C::B rev2745, I must add this two red lines to src/plugins/compilergcc/Makefile for building

INCLUDES = $(WX_CXXFLAGS) \
                -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk \
                -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk/wxscintilla/include \
                -I$(top_srcdir)/src/plugins/compilergcc/depslib/src \
                -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk/scripting/include \
                -I$(top_srcdir)/src/sdk/scripting/sqplus

My system is Debian Sid, and use dpkg-buildpackage to build a deb

I already checked for the last line : this is needed, strange nobody else suffers from this ????


EDIT : FORGET ABOUT THIS, IT HAD ALREADY BEEN FIXED (was looking at old stuff)

[mdelfede]

Is the problem with "no matching function for call to 'Push(SQVM*&, const wxArrayString&)'" reported into GCC Bugzilla? I am preparing RPMs for inclusion into Fedora Extras and this is a blocker.

I don't know, I posted to squirrel forum too, but they (correctly) tell that is a GCC issue.
I think we should make a short code snippet showing the problem and then post it to bugzilla. Like that is too long code to post there.

Ciao

Max

[SharkCZ]

Is the problem with "no matching function for call to 'Push(SQVM*&, const wxArrayString&)'" reported into GCC Bugzilla? I am preparing RPMs for inclusion into Fedora Extras and this is a blocker.

I don't know, I posted to squirrel forum too, but they (correctly) tell that is a GCC issue.
I think we should make a short code snippet showing the problem and then post it to bugzilla. Like that is too long code to post there.

Any problem, that is not in a bugzilla, is not a problem ;-) And the shorter will be the test case the better. And because the code is right (I trust you :-) ), it worked in earlier versions then there is a high chance that it will be fixed quickly. Can somebody create the test case?

[SharkCZ]

I have tried to compile the scriptbindings.cpp file with C++ from the latest snapshot of GCC 4.2 and the problem is still there.