News:

When registered with our forums, feel free to send a "here I am" post here to differ human beings from SPAM bots.

Main Menu

Directories layout changed

Started by mandrav, February 13, 2007, 12:54:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

stahta01

Quote from: tiwag on February 14, 2007, 03:27:04 PM
Quote from: mandrav on February 13, 2007, 07:34:44 PM
As for the ANSI version patch, I 'm not touching it until Tiwag or Seth sees it (they 're working with it)...

Quote from: stahta01 on February 13, 2007, 08:06:39 PM
I uploaded my updated patch file to Berlios
[ Patch #1884 ] Updated ANSI build patch file ANSI_BUILD_cb-projectfiles.pat
https://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=1884&group_id=5358

thanks tim !

since i sent my notebook with Win98 into retirement at end of 2006
i don't have any 16bit WinOS for testing ansi builds ....

should we delete the ansi patch file from svn ?
or is anyone working with it and still does provide ansi builds ?

thx --tiwag

Removing it from SVN makes sense to me, I think we should create a wiki page with the information on it instead.

Tim S
C Programmer working to learn more about C++.
On Windows 10 64 bit and Windows 11 64 bit.
--
When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. [url="http://wiki.codeblocks.org"]http://wiki.codeblocks.org[/url]

tiwag

Quote from: stahta01 on February 14, 2007, 04:14:37 PM
Removing it from SVN makes sense to me, I think we should create a wiki page with the information on it instead.

ok, removed the ANSI_BUILD_cb-projectfiles.patch from svn

my latest patchfile vs. svn rev 3605 is attached here

--tiwag


[attachment deleted by admin]

MortenMacFly

Quote from: Biplab on February 14, 2007, 01:55:43 PM
sdk.doxy file needs to patched. Patch file is attached with this post.  :)
Applied that (with slightly modifications) in SVN. Thanks.
Have also uploaded another revision of the SDK docs (codeblocks_sdk_doc_r3605.chm). SDK hasn't changed which would be relevant to the docs... but I had done it anyway for testing... ;-)
Wit regards, Morten.
Ps.: @Yiannis: Would you move the chm to the usual position, please?!
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: [url="https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html"]https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html[/url]
C::B FAQ: [url="https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ"]https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ[/url]

Biplab

@Morten,

Thanks for the update.  :)

Today I've compiled the SDK Manual. It's now 4MB+ in size. But it lacks detailed graphs. ;)
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

sethjackson

#19
Quote from: killerbot on February 14, 2007, 03:42:53 PM
seth does provide from time to time an ansi build

Yeah I haven't done one in awhile though.....

Maybe I should make one more often....

MortenMacFly

Quote from: Biplab on February 14, 2007, 04:50:11 PM
Today I've compiled the SDK Manual. It's now 4MB+ in size. But it lacks detailed graphs. ;)
I know. This is one of the modification I held back until now. IMHO you don't really need the call- and caller-graphs. At least I'm well without and it saves quite a lot of band-width. In the end if someone really needs them (s)he can compile her/himself. If people request them urgently back... they will return. No problem. ;-)
With regards, Morten.
Compiler logging: Settings->Compiler & Debugger->tab "Other"->Compiler logging="Full command line"
C::B Manual: [url="https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html"]https://www.codeblocks.org/docs/main_codeblocks_en.html[/url]
C::B FAQ: [url="https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ"]https://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=FAQ[/url]

jfpjr


stahta01

C Programmer working to learn more about C++.
On Windows 10 64 bit and Windows 11 64 bit.
--
When in doubt, read the CB WiKi FAQ. [url="http://wiki.codeblocks.org"]http://wiki.codeblocks.org[/url]

Biplab

#23
I've compiled C::B with GCC-4.1.1 in Windows. I deleted the sdk folder and then downloaded again from svn. That solved the problem.

SVN number problem is solved. But there is one more issue. In the start page the the SVN date is wrongly printed. Please look at the following line which I'm getting in the Start Page.

Quotesvn build  rev 3607 (2007-02-14T15:36:18.174745Z)   gcc 4.1.1 Windows/unicode

svn info --xml --non-interactive command returns date as-
Quote<date>2007-02-14T15:36:18.174745Z</date>

It needs to be parsed properly by autorevision.exe before it generates autorevision.h file. I'm using the following patch to solve the problem.

Index: src/build_tools/autorevision/autorevision.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/build_tools/autorevision/autorevision.cpp (revision 3607)
+++ src/build_tools/autorevision/autorevision.cpp (working copy)
@@ -123,7 +123,11 @@
             revision = e->Attribute("revision") ? e->Attribute("revision") : "";
             TiXmlElement *d = e->FirstChildElement("date");
             if(d && d->GetText())
+            {
                 date = d->GetText();
+                date = date.substr(0, date.find_first_of('T')) + " "
+                    + date.substr(date.find_first_of('T') + 1, date.find_first_of('.') - date.find_first_of('T') - 1);
+            }

             return 1;
         }


Regards,

Biplab :D
Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem.

killerbot

also onlinux there's such a problem :

Quotesvn build rev 3609 (2007-02-15T15:43:11.509615Z) gcc 4.1.2 Linux/unicode