News:

The new Release 25.03 is out! You can download binaries for Windows and many major Linux distros here .

Main Menu

Visual C++ 2008 Support?

Started by dwmcqueen, July 13, 2007, 03:42:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

dwmcqueen

Has anyone attempted to intergrate the compiler included in Visual C++ 2008 (Orca beta) in CodeBlocks yet?  I assume there are different options to the compiler than there were to 2005.

lubos

i have tried orcas, and i have throwed it away, ide is good but its horrible compiler in MY opinion. however it could be useful, at least project import  :P

dwmcqueen

Good to know.  What don't you like about the compiler (which is the only reason I'd take a look if it was better than 2005's)?

lubos

try to compile lightfeather3d engine with it  :( after this incident im not using it anymoore   :P however for other things it could be very good compiler =)
ps: im using mingw :)

dwmcqueen

Did you get the same result VC++ 2005 or 2003?

I use MingW also normally...but like to have options.

lubos

i have tried it with 2005 and everything worked perfectly. seems like 2008 comes with modified standard headers  :?

rickg22

modified standard headers? O.o
What does that mean? That they're not standard after all?

lubos

Quote from: rickg22 on July 14, 2007, 04:06:39 PM
That they're not standard after all?
hehe yes thats what i think!  :lol:

Grom

Microsoft has own standard. On my work place lot of people  migrating to Linux after meeting with Vista :shock:... Lots of them are switching to Ubuntu. Still don't know which Linux is the best.
gcc+winXP+suse.

Kiryn

lubos your ignorant. Why would you wanna use GCC? Generate stupid makefiles. Have bulky executables. And other stuff. Just cause it didn't compile for your stupid engine. Your going to say it sucks. Maybe its cause you don't know what your doing or maybe. The stupid engine project files were badly setup.

killerbot

Quote from: Kiryn on July 24, 2007, 11:36:42 PM
lubos your ignorant. Why would you wanna use GCC? Generate stupid makefiles. Have bulky executables. And other stuff. Just cause it didn't compile for your stupid engine. Your going to say it sucks. Maybe its cause you don't know what your doing or maybe. The stupid engine project files were badly setup.

keep it polite please, instead if possible offer to help ...

lubos

Quote from: Kiryn on July 24, 2007, 11:36:42 PM
lubos your ignorant. Why would you wanna use GCC? Generate stupid makefiles. Have bulky executables. And other stuff. Just cause it didn't compile for your stupid engine. Your going to say it sucks. Maybe its cause you don't know what your doing or maybe. The stupid engine project files were badly setup.

i agree with you, but as i said:

Quote
its horrible compiler in !!! MY !!! opinion

Quote
however for other things it could be very good compiler =)

and its not my engine

mandrav

Quote from: Kiryn on July 24, 2007, 11:36:42 PM
lubos your ignorant. Why would you wanna use GCC? Generate stupid makefiles. Have bulky executables. And other stuff. Just cause it didn't compile for your stupid engine. Your going to say it sucks. Maybe its cause you don't know what your doing or maybe. The stupid engine project files were badly setup.

Kiryn, reconsider your attitude towards other board members...
Be patient!
This bug will be fixed soon...

rjmyst3

[url="http://wxformbuilder.org"]http://wxformbuilder.org[/url]

killerbot

note that this is not new, also present in VC2005