News:

When registered with our forums, feel free to send a "here I am" post here to differ human beings from SPAM bots.

Main Menu

Why CB doesn't use QT4 ? but use wxWidget ?

Started by lonelyforest, May 05, 2008, 04:45:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

lonelyforest

I am new BC , Why CB doesn't use QT4 ? but use wxWidget ?

Just ....


BC is powerful, i will use it on my computer, Fedora 9~~~~~~~~~~~~ but I use KDE4

darthdespotism


mandrav

Be patient!
This bug will be fixed soon...

rickg22

#3
BC = typo for CB, i think. Anyway, here's my personal interpretation for why we use wxWidgets instead of QT.

wxWidgets is portable to many platforms, and it uses the platform's native widgets when possible, which makes a good cross-platform implementation, at least for Windows. Windows users shouldn't be asked to install X, Y or Z widget library separately before installing a program - and when they do, the end result isn't exactly pretty. I believe that choosing wxWidgets as the widget library was a key factor in making C::B a success.

That, and considering that in its beginnings, C::B was a Windows-only program, wxWidgets was the only practical choice.

Auria

And maybe you could ask GIMP devs why they use GTK and not KDE, and maybe you could ask inkscape developers why they use GTK and not KDE... and maybe i could ask you why you're starting yet another GUI toolkit flamewar instead of using KDevelop or bearing with GTK

Michael

Hello,

personally, I like both wxWidgets and Qt, even if I am more experienced with the latter. If I have to chose one of them for a given project/task, I will look at its requirements and at my skills and knowledge on the "GUI" tool.

Also I think that this question has been asked already somehow :). Just make a forum(s) search.

Best wishes,
Michael
[url="http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png"]http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9728/411948picture4em.png[/url]

lonelyforest